Are the Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal/Posterior Lumbar Fusion Influenced by the Patient's Age or BMI?

被引:1
作者
Manson, Neil [1 ,2 ]
Hubbe, Ulrich [3 ]
Pereira, Paulo [4 ,5 ]
Lam, Khai [6 ]
Fuster, Salvador [7 ]
Senker, Wolfgang [8 ]
机构
[1] Canada East Spine Ctr, St John, NB, Canada
[2] Horizon Hlth Network, St John, NB, Canada
[3] Univ Freiburg, Med Ctr, Clin Neurosurg, Fac Med, Freiburg, Germany
[4] Univ Porto, Ctr Hosp S Joao, Porto, Portugal
[5] Univ Porto, Fac Med, Porto, Portugal
[6] London Bridge Hosp, AO London Bridge Spine Ctr, Spine Ctr, London, England
[7] Hosp Clin Barcelona, IBT Inst Barceloni Traumatol, Clin Corachan, Barcelona, Spain
[8] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Kepler Univ Klin Neuromed Campus, Dept Neurosurg, Linz, Austria
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2020年 / 33卷 / 07期
关键词
minimally invasive spine surgery; minimally invasive; lumbar interbody fusion; minimal access spinal technologies; degenerative lumbar disorder; BMI; age; BODY-MASS INDEX; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; SPINE SURGERY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: A retrospective subgroup analysis of a prospective observational study was carried out. Summary of Background Data: Patients' baseline characteristics may influence the clinical outcomes after minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion (MILIF). Objective: This study aimed to investigate the influence of patient's age and body mass index (BMI) on the clinical outcomes of MILIF for degenerative lumbar disorder. Materials and Methods: A total of 252 patients underwent MILIF. The clinical outcomes, including time to first ambulation, time to postsurgical recovery, back/leg pain in visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and EuroQol-5 Dimension, were collected at baseline, 4 weeks, 6, and 12 months. Patients were subgrouped by age (50 y and below: N=102; 51-64 y: N=102; 65 y and above: N=48) and BMI (<= 25.0:N=79; 25.1-29.9: N=104; >= 30.0: N=69). Data from baseline to 12 months were compared for all clinical outcomes within age/BMI subgroups. Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were summarized by age and BMI subgroups. Results: All age and BMI subgroups showed significant improvements in clinical outcomes at 12 months compared with the baseline. The median time to first ambulation was similar for all subgroups (age groups: P=0.8707; BMI: P=0.1013); older people show a trend of having longer time to postsurgical recovery (age groups: P=0.0662; BMI: P=0.1591). Oswestry Disability Index, back, and leg pain visual analog scale, and EuroQol-5 Dimension were similar in all subgroups at every timepoint. A total of 50 AEs (N=39) were reported, 9 of which were SAEs; 3 AEs and 1 SAE were considered to be related to surgical procedure. No differences were observed in safety by age groups and BMI groups. Conclusion: MILIF appears to be safe and effective, independent of age or weight in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disorder.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 291
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reduced Acute Care Costs With the ERAS® Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared With Conventional Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Wang, Michael Y.
    Chang, Hsuan Kan
    Grossman, Jay
    NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 83 (04) : 827 - 834
  • [22] Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Kong Hwee Lee
    Wai Mun Yue
    William Yeo
    Henry Soeharno
    Seang Beng Tan
    European Spine Journal, 2012, 21 : 2265 - 2270
  • [23] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multilevel: Comparison with Conventional Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
    Lee, Won-chul
    Park, Jeong-Yoon
    Kim, Kyung Hyun
    Kuh, Sung Uk
    Chin, Dong Kyu
    Kim, Keun Su
    Cho, Yong Eun
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 85 : 236 - 243
  • [24] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spine
    Chaudhary, Kshitij S.
    Groff, Michael W.
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2011, 26 (03) : 146 - 155
  • [25] Perioperative and postoperative complications of single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in elderly adults
    Lee, Peter
    Fessler, Richard G.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 19 (01) : 111 - 114
  • [26] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Outpatient Setting
    Emami, Arash
    Faloon, Michael
    Issa, Kimona
    Shafa, Eiman
    Pourtaheri, Sina
    Sinha, Kumar
    Hwang, Ki S.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 39 (06) : E1218 - E1222
  • [27] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Diseases
    Fan Shunwu
    Zhao Xing
    Zhao Fengdong
    Fang Xiangqian
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (17) : 1615 - 1620
  • [28] Impact of Early Depressive Burden on Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Wolf, Jacob C.
    Anwar, Fatima N.
    Roca, Andrea M.
    Loya, Alexandra C.
    Medakkar, Srinath S.
    Kaul, Aayush
    Khosla, Ishan
    Hartman, Timothy J.
    Nie, James W.
    Macgregor, Keith R.
    Oyetayo, Omolabake O.
    Zheng, Eileen
    Federico, Vincent P.
    Sayari, Arash J.
    Lopez, Gregory D.
    Singh, Kern
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2025, 38 (02): : 51 - 57
  • [29] The effect of a radiographic solid fusion on clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Park, Yung
    Ha, Joong Won
    Lee, Yun Tae
    Sung, Na Young
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 11 (03) : 205 - 212
  • [30] MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION IN DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SPINE DISEASE
    Gupta, Pankaj
    Sharma, Arvind
    Singh, Jitendra
    Deen, Shameer
    Tanwar, Akansha
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (105): : 17055 - 17057