Psychological Evaluations in Family Law Proceedings: A Systematic Review of the Contemporary Literature

被引:12
作者
Zumbach, Jelena [1 ]
Koglin, Ute [1 ]
机构
[1] Carl von Ossietzky Univ Oldenburg, D-26111 Oldenburg, Germany
关键词
child custody evaluations; child custody; visitation rights; termination of parental rights; systematic review; CHILD-CUSTODY EVALUATIONS; PARENTS; RECOMMENDATIONS; DECISIONS; INTERESTS;
D O I
10.1037/a0039329
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Over the past several decades, empirical research on psychological evaluations in family law proceedings has identified strengths and weaknesses in this important area of assessment (Bow, 2006; Saini, 2008). This systematic review aims to provide a current and comprehensive summary of empirical research findings on psychological evaluation practice. Twenty studies published from 1997 to 2013 in North America were included from a systematic literature search and analyzed in detail. Results are presented for a number of evaluation-related parameters, such as the kind of mental health professional evaluating, the assessment methods applied in evaluation practice, evaluator's recommendations, and mental health characteristics of the evaluated families. Results are displayed both for evaluations in cases of child custody and visitation rights and for evaluations in cases of termination of parental rights. Current strengths and weaknesses in evaluation practice and evaluation research are discussed. Recommendations for practice and future research are considered.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 234
页数:14
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Abidin R., 1995, Parent Stress Inventory, V3rd
[2]   CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATION PRACTICES: A 20-YEAR FOLLOW-UP [J].
Ackerman, Marc J. ;
Pritzl, Tracy Brey .
FAMILY COURT REVIEW, 2011, 49 (03) :618-628
[3]   Custody evaluation practices: A survey of experienced professionals (Revisited) [J].
Ackerman, MJ ;
Ackerman, MC .
PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 1997, 28 (02) :137-145
[4]   Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychology [J].
不详 .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2013, 68 (01) :7-19
[5]  
American Psychological Association, 2010, Am Psychol, V65, P863, DOI 10.1037/a0021250
[6]   A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists [J].
Archer, Robert P. ;
Buffington-Vollum, Jacqueline K. ;
Stredny, Rebecca Vauter ;
Handel, Richard W. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2006, 87 (01) :84-94
[7]   Judging the best interests of the child: Judges' accounts of the tender years doctrine [J].
Artis, JE .
LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW, 2004, 38 (04) :769-806
[8]  
Bogacki D., 2007, J PSYCHIAT L, V35, P25
[9]  
Bow J.N., 2002, Family Court Review, V40, P164, DOI [10.1111/j.174-1617.2002.tb00827.x, DOI 10.1111/J.174-1617.2002.TB00827.X]
[10]   Testing in child custody evaluations - Selection, usage, and Daubert admissibility: A survey of psychologists [J].
Bow, James N. ;
Gould, Jonathan W. ;
Flens, James R. ;
Greenhut, Dana .
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY PRACTICE, 2006, 6 (02) :17-38