Believing processes around COVID-19 vaccination: An exploratory study investigating workers in the health sector

被引:1
作者
Fleischmann, Eva [1 ]
Fellendorf, Frederike [1 ]
Schoenthaler, Elena M. [1 ]
Lenger, Melanie [1 ]
Hiendl, Lena [1 ]
Bonkat, Nina [1 ]
Wagner-Skacel, Jolana [2 ]
Bengesser, Susanne [1 ]
Angel, Hans-Ferdinand [3 ]
Seitz, Ruediger J. [4 ]
Reininghaus, Eva Z. [1 ]
Dalkner, Nina [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Graz, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapeut Med, Graz, Austria
[2] Med Univ Graz, Dept Med Psychol & Psychotherapy, Graz, Austria
[3] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Dept Catechet & Religious Educ, Graz, Austria
[4] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Med Fac, Ctr Neurol & Neuropsychiat, Dept Neurol,LVR Klinikum Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY | 2022年 / 13卷
关键词
COVID-19; vaccination; workers in the health sector; cognition; emotion; credition; beliefs; CARE WORKERS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2022.993323
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: The processes underlying believing have been labeled "creditions ", which are important brain functions between emotion and cognition. Creditions are influenced by both internal and external factors, one of which is the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the vaccination against the disease. Methods: To investigate believing processes shortly before the implementation of a mandatory vaccination in Austria, both vaccinated and unvaccinated workers in the health sector (WHS) were surveyed in December 2021/January 2022. In total, 1,062 vaccinated and 97 unvaccinated WHS (920 females) completed the online survey. Beliefs were assessed using the parameters of the credition model (narrative, certainty, emotion, and mightiness) with regard to (1) the COVID-19 pandemic in general, and (2) the vaccination. Type of emotion and narrative were divided into positive, negative, and indifferent. Moreover, the congruence between emotion and narrative was calculated. Results: The vaccination rate of the sample was 91.6%, with a significantly higher percentage of men being in the group of vaccinated (21.1%) as compared to unvaccinated individuals (12.4%). Pertaining beliefs about the COVID-19 vaccination, unvaccinated WHS reported more negative and less positive emotions as well as content of narrative than vaccinated WHS. In addition, they showed higher levels of certainty as well as mightiness while believing and felt less sufficiently informed about governmental and workplace-related COVID-19 measures. The groups did not differ in the type of emotion or content of narrative in their beliefs about the pandemic in general. Conclusion: In conclusion, unvaccinated WHS had more negative and less positive emotions and thoughts than vaccinated WHS in their beliefs about the COVID-19 vaccination and their motivations for not having received it. They were more certain about their beliefs and felt stronger negative emotions in their beliefs compared to vaccinated individuals. Providing unvaccinated WHS with adequate information might be helpful in reducing their mental burden.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Aachener Nachrichten, 2021, FRANKR DAN WERD HOCH
  • [2] Agentur fur Gesundheit und Ernahrungssicherheit, 2022, AGES DASHB COVID 19
  • [3] Exploring the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers and general population using health belief model
    Al-Metwali, Basma Zuheir
    Al-Jumaili, Ali Azeez
    Al-Alag, Zahraa Adel
    Sorofman, Bernard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 27 (05) : 1112 - 1122
  • [4] Angel HF, 2017, NEW APP SC STU RELIG, V1, P17, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-50924-2_2
  • [5] Angel Hans-Ferdinand, 2016, SFU Forschungs Bulletin, V4, P1, DOI DOI 10.15135/2016.4.1.1-20
  • [6] THE COVID-19 VACCINATION ACCEPTANCE/HESITANCY RATE AND ITS DETERMINANTS AMONG HEALTHCARE WORKERS OF 91 COUNTRIES: A MULTICENTER CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
    Askarian, Mehrdad
    Semenov, Aleksandr
    Llopis, Ferran
    Rubulotta, Francesca
    Dragovac, Gorana
    Pshenichnaya, Natalia
    Assadian, Ojan
    Ruch, Yvon
    Shayan, Zahra
    Fortunatti, Cristobal Padilla
    Lucey, Daniel
    Almohaizeie, Abdullah
    Kamal, Abu Hena Mostafa
    Ogunshe, Adenike
    Konkayev, Aidos
    Beg, Asim
    Primerano, Enzo
    Amer, Fatma
    Pilli, Hema Prakash Kumari
    Hung, Ivan
    Ayoade, Folusakin
    Lefrant, Jean Yves
    Zajkowska, Joanna
    Rello, Jordi
    Kazi, Momin
    Taghrir, Mohammad Hossein
    Blot, Stijn
    Leib, Stephen
    Hosseinpour, Parisa
    Hosseinpour, Hamidreza
    Erfani, Amirhossein
    Borazjani, Roham
    Akbarialiabad, Hossein
    Najafi, Masoud
    Askarian, Ardalan
    Erdem, Hakan
    [J]. EXCLI JOURNAL, 2022, 21 : 93 - 103
  • [7] COVID-19 pandemic effects on health worker's mental health: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aymerich, Claudia
    Pedruzo, Borja
    Perez, Jose Luis
    Laborda, Maria
    Herrero, Jon
    Blanco, Jorge
    Mancebo, Gonzalo
    Andres, Lucia
    Estevez, Olatz
    Fernandez, Maitane
    Salazar de Pablo, Gonzalo
    Catalan, Ana
    Gonzalez-Torres, Miguel Angel
    [J]. EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 65 (01)
  • [8] COVID-19 vaccination beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours among health and social care workers in the UK: A mixed-methods study
    Bell, Sadie
    Clarke, Richard M.
    Ismail, Sharif A.
    Ojo-Aromokudu, Oyinkansola
    Naqvi, Habib
    Coghill, Yvonne
    Donovan, Helen
    Letley, Louise
    Paterson, Pauline
    Mounier-Jack, Sandra
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (01):
  • [9] COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy in Italian healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bianchi, Francesco Paolo
    Stefanizzi, Pasquale
    Brescia, Nazario
    Lattanzio, Sabrina
    Martinelli, Andrea
    Tafuri, Silvio
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES, 2022, 21 (09) : 1289 - 1300
  • [10] The Nature and Extent of COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitancy in Healthcare Workers
    Biswas, Nirbachita
    Mustapha, Toheeb
    Khubchandani, Jagdish
    Price, James H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2021, 46 (06) : 1244 - 1251