Anthrax as a biological weapon - Medical and public health management

被引:537
作者
Inglesby, TV
Henderson, DA
Bartlett, JG
Ascher, MS
Eitzen, E
Friedlander, AM
Hauer, J
McDade, J
Osterholm, MT
O'Toole, T
Parker, G
Perl, TM
Russell, PK
Tonat, K
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Johns Hopkins Ctr Civilian Biodef Studies, Baltimore, MD 21202 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Calif State Dept Hlth, Berkeley, CA USA
[5] USA, Med Res Inst Infect Dis, Frederick, MD USA
[6] Office Emergency Management, New York, NY USA
[7] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Atlanta, GA USA
[8] Minnesota Dept Hlth, Minneapolis, MN USA
[9] US Dept HHS, Office Emergency Preparedness, Rockville, MD USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 1999年 / 281卷 / 18期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.281.18.1735
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To develop consensus-based recommendations for measures to be taken by medical and public health professionals following the use of anthrax as a biological weapon against a civilian population. Participants The working group included 21 representatives from staff of major academic medical centers and research, government, military, public health, and emergency management institutions and agencies. Evidence MEDLINE databases were searched from January 1966 to April 1998, using the Medical Subject Headings anthrax, Bacillus anthracis, biological weapon, biological terrorism, biological warfare, and biowarfare. Review of references identified by this search led to identification of relevant references published prior to 1966, In addition, participants identified other unpublished references and sources. Consensus Process The first draft of the consensus statement was a synthesis of information obtained in the formal evidence-gathering process. Members of the working group provided formal written comments which were incorporated into the second draft of the statement. The working group reviewed the second draft on June 12, 1998. No significant disagreements existed and comments were incorporated into a third draft. The fourth and final statement incorporates all relevant evidence obtained by the literature search in conjunction with final consensus recommendations supported by all working group members. Conclusions Specific consensus recommendations are made regarding the diagnosis of anthrax, indications for vaccination, therapy for those exposed, postexposure prophylaxis, decontamination of the environment, and additional research needs.
引用
收藏
页码:1735 / 1745
页数:11
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [11] *CDCP, 1994, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V43, P70
  • [12] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1998, MMWR MORB MORTAL WKL, V48, P69
  • [13] CHINN KS, 1996, PUBLICATION US DEP A, P1
  • [14] Biological warfare - A historical perspective
    Christopher, GW
    Cieslak, TJ
    Pavlin, JA
    Eitzen, EM
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 278 (05): : 412 - 417
  • [15] The specter of biological weapons
    Cole, LA
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1996, 275 (06) : 60 - 65
  • [16] CRISTY GA, 1981, PUBLICATION ORNL
  • [17] BACILLUS-ANTHRACIS AEROSOLS IN GOAT HAIR PROCESSING MILLS
    DAHLGREN, CM
    BUCHANAN, LM
    DECKER, HM
    FREED, SW
    PHILLIPS, CR
    BRACHMAN, PS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYGIENE, 1960, 72 (01): : 24 - 31
  • [18] DALLDORF FG, 1971, ARCH PATHOL, V92, P418
  • [19] *DEF INT AG, 1986, PUBL US DEP DEF
  • [20] ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF BACILLUS-ANTHRACIS
    DOGANAY, M
    AYDIN, N
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1991, 23 (03) : 333 - 335