Decision Making in Adults With ADHD

被引:52
作者
Mantyla, Timo [1 ]
Still, Johanna
Gullberg, Stina
Del Missier, Fabio [2 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Dept Psychol, S-90187 Umea, Sweden
[2] Univ Trieste, I-34127 Trieste, Italy
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
decision making; executive functioning; ADHD; RISK TASK BART; DEFICIT-HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; SOMATIC MARKER HYPOTHESIS; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS; YOUNG-ADULTS; DOUBLE-BLIND; ATTENTION; CHILDREN; JUDGMENT;
D O I
10.1177/1087054709360494
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study examined decision-making competence in ADHD by using multiple decision tasks with varying demands on analytic versus affective processes. Methods: Adults with ADHD and healthy controls completed two tasks of analytic decision making, as measured by the Adult Decision-Making Competence (A-DMC) battery, and two affective decision tasks (the Balloon Analog Risk Task and the lowa Gambling Task). Results: Although a majority of the ADHD participants were tested under medication, they showed impairments in both types of task. However, logistic regression analysis showed that the applying-decision-rules task of the A-DMC battery was the only significant predictor of ADHD status. Conclusions: These findings suggested that ADHD is associated with impaired decision making in tasks involving a significant degree of cognitive control. Although both deliberative and affective neurocognitive systems probably contributed to ADHD-related problems in decision making, the findings underlined the involvement of prefrontally mediated executive functions. (J. of Att. Dis. 2012; 16(2) 164-173)
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 173
页数:10
相关论文
共 65 条
[51]   The utility of personality variables and behaviorally-based measures in the prediction of risk-taking behavior [J].
Skeel, Reid L. ;
Neudecker, John ;
Pilarski, Carrie ;
Pytlak, Kimberley .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2007, 43 (01) :203-214
[52]   The empirical case for two systems of reasoning [J].
Sloman, SA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 119 (01) :3-22
[53]   Affect, risk, and decision making [J].
Slovic, P ;
Peters, E ;
Finucane, ML ;
MacGregor, DG .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 24 (04) :S35-S40
[54]   Risk perception and affect [J].
Slovic, Paul ;
Peters, Ellen .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 15 (06) :322-325
[55]   Causal models of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: From common simple deficits to multiple developmental pathways [J].
Sonuga-Barke, EJS .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 57 (11) :1231-1238
[56]   The dual pathway model of AD/HD: an elaboration of neuro-developmental characteristics [J].
Sonuga-Barke, EJS .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2003, 27 (07) :593-604
[57]  
SPENCER T, 1995, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V52, P434
[58]   Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? [J].
Stanovich, KE ;
West, RF .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2000, 23 (05) :645-+
[59]   On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability [J].
Stanovich, Keith E. ;
West, Richard F. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 94 (04) :672-695
[60]   A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking [J].
Steinberg, Laurence .
DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW, 2008, 28 (01) :78-106