Artificial neural networks and fuzzy time series forecasting: an application to air quality

被引:48
作者
Abd Rahman, Nur Haizum [1 ]
Lee, Muhammad Hisyam [1 ]
Suhartono [2 ]
Latif, Mohd Talib [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Dept Math Sci, Fac Sci, Skudai 81310, Johor, Malaysia
[2] Inst Teknol Sepuluh Nopember, Dept Stat, Fac Math & Nat Sci, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia
[3] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Sch Environm & Nat Resource Sci, Fac Sci & Technol, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
关键词
Artificial neural network; Air Pollution Index (API); Time series; Forecasting; Fuzzy time series; ARIMA; POLLUTION; ENROLLMENTS; MODELS; INDEX;
D O I
10.1007/s11135-014-0132-6
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The arising air pollution has addressed much attention globally due to its detrimental effects on human health and environment. As an early warning system for air quality control and management, it is important to provide precise information about the future concentrations in pollutants. We present here a time series model in predicting the Air Pollution Index (API) from three different stations; industrial, residential, and sub-urban areas between 2000 and 2009. In this paper, the Box-Jenkins approach of seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), artificial neural network (ANN), and three models of fuzzy time series (FTS) have been compared by using the mean absolute percentage error, mean absolute error, mean square error, and root mean square error. Although all the methods were used as operational tools, the ANN seemed more accurate in forecasting API. The results showed that FTS (i.e. Chen's, Yu's, and Cheng's) performed inconsistent results since the conventional methods of ARIMA outperformed the performance of FTS. However, consistent results were achieved as the ANNs gave the smallest forecasting error compared to FTS and ARIMA.
引用
收藏
页码:2633 / 2647
页数:15
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Review of air pollution and health impacts in Malaysia [J].
Afroz, R ;
Hassan, MN ;
Ibrahim, NA .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 92 (02) :71-77
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Time Series Analysis
[3]   ERROR MEASURES FOR GENERALIZING ABOUT FORECASTING METHODS - EMPIRICAL COMPARISONS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
COLLOPY, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1992, 8 (01) :69-80
[4]   A Simple Feedforward Neural Network for the PM10 Forecasting: Comparison with a Radial Basis Function Network and a Multivariate Linear Regression Model [J].
Caselli, M. ;
Trizio, L. ;
de Gennaro, G. ;
Ielpo, P. .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2009, 201 (1-4) :365-377
[5]   Forecasting enrollments based on fuzzy time series [J].
Chen, SM .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1996, 81 (03) :311-319
[6]   Forecasting enrollments based on high-order fuzzy time series [J].
Chen, SM .
CYBERNETICS AND SYSTEMS, 2002, 33 (01) :1-16
[7]   Fuzzy time-series based on adaptive expectation model for TAIEX forecasting [J].
Cheng, Ching-Hsue ;
Chen, Tai-Liang ;
Teoh, Hia Jong ;
Chiang, Chen-Han .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2008, 34 (02) :1126-1132
[8]   Time series forecasting with neural networks: A comparative study using the airline data [J].
Faraway, J ;
Chatfield, C .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 1998, 47 :231-250
[9]   Fuzzy environmental decision-making: applications to air pollution [J].
Fisher, B .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 37 (14) :1865-1877
[10]   Fuzzy approaches to environmental decisions: application to air quality [J].
Fisher, BEA .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2006, 9 (01) :22-31