The accuracy of self-reported health behaviors and risk factors relating to cancer and cardiovascular disease in the general population - A critical review

被引:313
作者
Newell, SA
Girgis, A
Sanson-Fisher, RW
Savolainen, NJ
机构
[1] NSW Canc Council Canc Educ Res Program, Wallsend, NSW 2287, Australia
[2] Univ Newcastle, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
self-disclosure; databases; MEDLINE; cancer; cardiovascular disease; behavior; health; review literature;
D O I
10.1016/S0749-3797(99)00069-0
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To critically review the literature concerning the accuracy of self-reported health behaviors and risk factors relating to cancer and cardiovascular disease among the general population. Methods: A literature search was conducted on three major health research databases: MEDLINE, HealthPLAN, and PsychLit. The bibliographies of located articles were also checked for additional relevant references.:Studies meeting the following five inclusion criteria were included in the review: . They were investigating the accuracy of self-report among the general population, as opposed to among clinical populations. . They employed an adequate and appropriate gold standard. . At least 70% of respondents consented to validation, where validation imposed minimal demands on the respondent; and 60% consent to validation was considered acceptable where validation imposed a greater burden. . They had a sample size capable of estimating sensitivity and specificity rates with 95% confidence intervals of width +/- 10%. . The time lag between collection of the self-report and validation data for physical measures did not exceed one month. Results: Twenty-four of 66 identified studies met all the inclusion criteria described above. In the vast majority, self-report data consistently underestimated the proportion of individuals considered "at-risk." Similarly, community prevalences of risk factors were considerably higher according to gold standard data sources than they were according to self-report data. Conclusions: This review casts serious doubts on the wisdom of relying exclusively on self-reported health information. It suggests that caution should be exercised both when trying to identify at-risk individuals and when estimating the prevalence of risk factors among the general population. The review also suggests a number of ways in which the accuracy of individuals' self-reported health information can be maximized.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 229
页数:19
相关论文
共 133 条
[1]   FOCUS ON PSYCHOMETRICS USE OF HEALTH RECORDS IN RESEARCH - RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY ISSUES [J].
AARONSON, LS ;
BURMAN, ME .
RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 1994, 17 (01) :67-73
[2]  
AGUINIS H, 1993, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V23, P353
[3]   HOW ACCURATE IS SELF-REPORTED FAMILY HISTORY OF COLORECTAL-CANCER [J].
AITKEN, J ;
BAIN, C ;
WARD, M ;
SISKIND, V ;
MACLENNAN, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 141 (09) :863-871
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Evaluating Health Promotion
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1993, GOALS TARGETS AUSTR
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1996, GUID CLIN PREV SERV
[7]  
ARROLL B, 1991, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V2, P2996
[8]  
*AUSTR BUR STAT, 1992, 33030 AUSTR BUR STAT
[9]   METHODOLOGIC ISSUES IN SELF-REPORT OF HEALTH BEHAVIOR [J].
BARANOWSKI, T .
JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 1985, 55 (05) :179-182
[10]   THE EFFECTS OF SOCIAL DEMAND ON BREAST SELF-EXAMINATION SELF-REPORT [J].
BEACH, DL ;
MAYER, JA .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 1990, 13 (02) :195-205