Improving PICC use and outcomes in hospitalised patients: an interrupted time series study using MAGIC criteria

被引:53
作者
Swaminathan, Lakshmi [1 ]
Flanders, Scott [2 ]
Rogers, Mary [2 ]
Calleja, Yvonne [3 ]
Snyder, Ashley [2 ]
Thyagarajan, Rama [3 ]
Bercea, Priscila [3 ]
Chopra, Vineet [2 ]
机构
[1] Beaumont Hosp Dearborn, Internal Med, Dearborn, MI USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Beaumont Hosp, Infect Prevent & Control, Dearborn, MI USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
healthcare quality improvement; hospital medicine; implementation science; INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETERS; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS; BLOOD-STREAM INFECTION; RISK; THROMBOEMBOLISM; PATTERNS; ACCESS; COMPLICATIONS; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007342
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Although important in clinical care, reports of inappropriate peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) use are growing. Objective To test whether implementation of the Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC) can improve PICC use and patient outcomes. Design Quasi-experimental, interrupted time series design at one study site with nine contemporaneous external controls. Setting Ten hospitals participating in a state-wide quality collaborative from 1 August 2014 to 31 July 2016. Patients 963 hospitalised patients who received a PICC at the study site vs 6613 patients at nine control sites. Intervention A multimodal intervention (tool, training, electronic changes, education) derived from MAGIC. Measurements Appropriateness of PICC use and rates of PICC-associated complications. Segmented Poisson regression was used for analyses. Results Absolute rates of inappropriate PICC use decreased substantially at the study site versus controls (91.3% to 65.3% (-26.0%) vs 72.2% to 69.6% (-2.6%); P<0.001). After adjusting for underlying trends and patient characteristics, however, a marginally significant 13.8% decrease in inappropriate PICC use occurred at the study site (incidence rate ratio 0.86 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.99; P=0.048)); no change was observed at control sites. While the incidence of all PICC complications decreased to a greater extent at the study site, the absolute difference between controls and intervention was small (33.9% to 26.7% (-7.2%) vs 22.4% to 20.8% (-1.6%); P=0.036). Limitations Non-randomised design limits inference; the most effective component of the multimodal intervention is unknown; effects following implementation were modest. Conclusions In a multihospital quality improvement project, implementation of MAGIC improved PICC appropriateness and reduced complications to a modest extent. Given the size and resources required for this study, future work should consider cost-to-benefit ratio of similar approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 278
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] THE MIDLINE CATHETER: A CLINICAL REVIEW
    Adams, Daniel Z.
    Little, Andrew
    Vinsant, Charles
    Khandelwal, Sorabh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 51 (03) : 252 - 258
  • [2] Central Venous Catheter Placement by Advanced Practice Nurses Demonstrates Low Procedural Complication and Infection Rates-A Report From 13 Years of Service
    Alexandrou, Evan
    Spencer, Timothy R.
    Frost, Steven A.
    Mifflin, Nicholas
    Davidson, Patricia M.
    Hillman, Ken M.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (03) : 536 - 543
  • [3] Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial
    Bernal, James Lopez
    Cummins, Steven
    Gasparrini, Antonio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 46 (01) : 348 - 355
  • [4] Bloodstream Infection Event (Central Line Associated BloodstreamInfection and non central line associated Bloodstream Infection), CDC BLOODSTR INF DEV
  • [5] Chen Y, 2015, BIODIVERSITY AND BIOGEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS IN ASIA-PACIFIC REGION I: STATISTICAL METHODS AND CASE STUDIES, P1, DOI [10.2174/97816810801541150101, 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004372]
  • [6] Variations in Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Use and Outcomes in Michigan Hospitals
    Chopra, Vineet
    Smith, Shawna
    Swaminathan, Lakshmi
    Boldenow, Tanya
    Kaatz, Scott
    Bernstein, Steven J.
    Flanders, Scott A.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 176 (04) : 548 - 551
  • [7] Do Clinicians Know Which of Their Patients Have Central Venous Catheters? A Multicenter Observational Study
    Chopra, Vineet
    Govindan, Sushant
    Kuhn, Latoya
    Ratz, David
    Sweis, Randy F.
    Melin, Natalie
    Thompson, Rachel
    Tolan, Aaron
    Barron, James
    Saint, Sanjay
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 161 (08) : 562 - U61
  • [8] PICC-associated Bloodstream Infections: Prevalence, Patterns, and Predictors
    Chopra, Vineet
    Ratz, David
    Kuhn, Latoya
    Lopus, Tracy
    Chenoweth, Carol
    Krein, Sarah
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 127 (04) : 319 - 328
  • [9] The Risk of Bloodstream Infection Associated with Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters Compared with Central Venous Catheters in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chopra, Vineet
    O'Horo, John C.
    Rogers, Mary A. M.
    Maki, Dennis G.
    Safdar, Nasia
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 34 (09) : 908 - 918
  • [10] Risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chopra, Vineet
    Anand, Sarah
    Hickner, Andy
    Buist, Michael
    Rogers, Mary A. M.
    Saint, Sanjay
    Flanders, Scott A.
    [J]. LANCET, 2013, 382 (9889) : 311 - 325