Elderly patients with suspected chronic digoxin toxicity: A comparison of clinical characteristics of patients receiving and not receiving digoxin-Fab

被引:10
|
作者
Arbabian, Hooman [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Hwee Min [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Graudins, Andis [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Monash Hlth, Acute Med & Ambulatory Care Program, Monash Clin Toxicol Unit, Emergency Med Serv, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Hlth, Dandenong Hosp, Emergency Dept, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Sch Clin Sci, Monash Emergency Res Collaborat, Monash Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
antibody; atrial fibrillation; bradycardia; digoxin; immunotherapy; poisoning; THREATENING DIGITALIS INTOXICATION; ANTIBODY FRAGMENTS; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1111/1742-6723.12873
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to compare clinical features of patients with elevated serum digoxin concentrations who were treated with digoxin-Fab with those where the immunotherapy was not given by a tertiary hospital toxicology service. MethodsThis was a retrospective series of patients with supratherapeutic serum digoxin concentrations referred to the toxicology service from August 2013 to October 2015. Data collected included demographics, presenting complaint, digoxin dose, other medications taken, serum digoxin, potassium and creatinine concentration on presentation and initial and post-digoxin-Fab heart rate. ResultsThere were 47 referrals. Digoxin-Fab was administered in 21 cases. It was given more commonly when the heart rate was <51/min or serum potassium was >5.0mmol/L. Patients receiving digoxin-Fab were more likely to be on maintenance therapy with beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers (95% vs 61%; OR 13.1; 95% CI 1.5-113) and/or potassium-sparing medications (95% vs 54%; OR 17.1; 95% CI 2.0-147). They had elevated serum creatinine (76% vs 42%; OR 8.2; 95% CI 1.9-34), higher serum potassium (median: 5.1mmol/L vs 4.2mmol/L, P=0.02), higher serum digoxin concentration (median: 3.5nmol/L vs 2.3nmol/L, P=0.02) and pretreatment heart rate <51/min (66% vs 31%; OR 4.5; 95% CI 1.3-15). There were no patients with ventricular arrhythmias or hypotension. Median heart rate increased by 10/min 1 and 4 h after digoxin-Fab. However, individual heart rate response to digoxin-Fab was variable. ConclusionDigoxin-Fab was more commonly administered when heart rate was <51/min. It had a small effect on increasing heart rate; however, individual response to digoxin-Fab was variable as patients were using other negative chronotropic medications. In symptomatic bradycardic patients on multiple heart failure medications, positive chronotropic and potassium-lowering therapies should be considered in concert with digoxin-Fab.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 248
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Resaerch Paper: Ten Years of Experience in Treating Patients With Digoxin Toxicity Without Using Digoxin Fab Antibody
    Gheshlaghi, Farzad
    Wong, Anselm
    Dorooshi, Gholamali
    Meamar, Rokhsareh
    Tabesh, Faezeh
    Aminsafaei, Hajar
    Zoofaghari, Shafeajafar
    Eizadi-Mood, Nasiaran
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL TOXICOLOGY AND FORENSIC MEDICINE, 2021, 11 (01):
  • [2] Comparison of microparticle enzyme and fluorescence polarization immunoassays in pediatric patients not receiving digoxin
    Chicella, M
    Branim, B
    Lee, KR
    Phelps, SJ
    THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 1998, 20 (03) : 347 - 351
  • [3] Incidence of Noncompliance and its Influencing Factors in Patients Receiving Digoxin
    Takanori Miura
    Ryoji Kojima
    Youji Sugiura
    Masaru Mizutani
    Fumimaro Takatsu
    Yoshio Suzuki
    Clinical Drug Investigation, 2000, 19 : 123 - 130
  • [4] Electrocardiographic changes associated with hyperkalemia in patients with chronic digoxin toxicity
    Zarider, Nathan
    Wang, Josh J.
    Villeneuve, Eric
    Grunbaum, Ami
    Hoffman, Robert S.
    Gosselin, Sophie
    CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2017, 55 (07) : 853 - 854
  • [6] Characteristics and Outcomes of Suspected Digoxin Toxicity and Immune Fab Treatment Over the Past Two Decades-2000-2020
    Peters, Anthony E.
    Chiswell, Karen
    Hofmann, Paul
    Ambrosy, Andrew
    Fudim, Marat
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 183 : 129 - 136
  • [7] Digoxin Withdrawal Worsens Clinical Status in Stable Patients With Heart Failure Receiving Optimal Contemporaneous Therapy-A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Hopper, Ingrid
    Skiba, Marina
    von Lueder, Thomas G.
    Watanabe, Masataka
    Funston, Robyn
    Tonkin, Andrew
    Krum, Henry
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2015, 21 (09) : 779 - 781
  • [8] Digoxin use and clinical outcomes in elderly Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the Optimal Thromboprophylaxis in Elderly Chinese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (ChiOTEAF) registry
    Guo, Yutao
    Kotalczyk, Agnieszka
    Wang, Yutang
    Lip, Gregory Y. H.
    EUROPACE, 2022, 24 (07): : 1076 - 1083
  • [9] Comparison of digoxin versus low-dose amiodarone for ventricular rate control in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation
    Tse, HF
    Lam, YM
    Lau, CP
    Cheung, BM
    Kumana, CR
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 28 (5-6) : 446 - 450
  • [10] Comparison of the Effectiveness of Greater Occipital Nerve Block in Patients Receiving and not Receiving Medical Prophylactic Treatment in Chronic Migraine
    Golen, Meltem Karacan
    Okuyan, Dilek Yilmaz
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2022, 28 (01) : 19 - 23