Evaluation of p16INK4a/Ki-67 dual stain in comparison with an mRNA human papillomavirus test on liquid-based cytology samples with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion

被引:61
作者
Waldstrom, Marianne [1 ,2 ]
Christensen, Rikke Kolby [1 ]
Ornskov, Dorthe [3 ]
机构
[1] Vejle Hosp, Dept Clin Pathol, DK-7100 Vejle, Denmark
[2] Univ So Denmark, Inst Reg Hlth Serv Res, Odense, Denmark
[3] Vejle Hosp, Dept Clin Microbiol, DK-7100 Vejle, Denmark
关键词
APTIMA human papillomavirus (HPV) assay; CINtec PLUS test; dual immunocytochemical stain; low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL); triage; FOLLOW-UP; HPV DNA; WOMEN; P16(INK4A); TRIAGE; ASCUS; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTORS; NEOPLASIA; RISK;
D O I
10.1002/cncy.21233
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study was to investigate the clinical performance of detecting high-grade lesions with the CINtec PLUS p16INK4a/Ki-67 dual stain and the APTIMA human papillomavirus (HPV) Assay in a cohort of women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) cytology. The authors also assessed the reproducibility of the evaluation of immunocytochemical staining. METHODS: The 2 tests were performed on liquid-based residual material from 469 women with LSILs. The samples had at least 5 years of follow-up and the gold standard used was high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+/CIN3+) proven on histology. RESULTS: Approximately 69% of all the women included in the study had a positive test for HPV mRNA and 56% was positive for the dual stain. The 2 tests demonstrated high sensitivities. When examining the specificities, the APTIMA HPV Assay performed with significantly lower values than the CINtec PLUS test. For patients with CIN2+, the APTIMA HPV Assay had a specificity of 36.1% versus 51.3% for the CINtec PLUS test, and for women with CIN3+, the specificity was 33.8% versus 48.2%, respectively. The difference was even more pronounced when analyzing women aged < 30 years separately. The kappa values between the 3 observers in scoring the dual stain ranged from 0.43 to 0.49 and improved in a second evaluation round to values ranging from 0.50 to 0.66. CONCLUSIONS: The CINtec PLUS p16INK4a/Ki-67 dual-staining test in LSIL cytology samples demonstrated high sensitivity that was similar to that of the APTIMA HPV Assay in the detection of underlying high-grade disease but with enhanced specificity, especially among women aged < 30 years. The kappa value for the evaluation of the CINtec PLUS dual-staining test was moderate but could be improved through training. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2013. (c) 2012 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 145
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[11]   Risk assessment and clinical impact of liquid-based cytology, oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA and mRNA testing in primary cervical cancer screening (The FASE Study) [J].
Monsonego, Joseph ;
Hudgens, Michael G. ;
Zerat, Laurent ;
Zerat, Jean-Claude ;
Syrjanen, Karl ;
Smith, Jennifer S. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 125 (01) :175-180
[12]   Comparison of different commercial methods for HPV detection in follow-up cytology after ASCUS/LSIL, prediction of CIN2-3 in follow up biopsies and spontaneous regression of CIN2-3 [J].
Ovestad, Irene T. ;
Vennestrom, Undis ;
Andersen, Liv ;
Gudlaugsson, Einar ;
Munk, Ane Cecilie ;
Malpica, Anais ;
Feng, Weiwei ;
Voorhorst, Feja ;
Janssen, Emiel A. M. ;
Baak, Jan P. A. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 123 (02) :278-283
[13]   Aptima HPV E6/E7 mRNA Test Is as Sensitive as Hybrid Capture 2 Assay but More Specific at Detecting Cervical Precancer and Cancer [J].
Ratnam, Samuel ;
Coutlee, Francois ;
Fontaine, Dan ;
Bentley, James ;
Escott, Nicholas ;
Ghatage, Prafull ;
Gadag, Veeresh ;
Holloway, Glen ;
Bartellas, Elias ;
Kum, Nick ;
Giede, Christopher ;
Lear, Adrian .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 49 (02) :557-564
[14]   Performance of p16INK4a-cytology, HPV mRNA, and HPV DNA testing to identify high grade cervical dysplasia in women with abnormal screening results [J].
Reuschenbach, Miriam ;
Clad, Andreas ;
Doeberitz, Christina von Knebel ;
Wentzensen, Nicolas ;
Rahmsdorf, Janina ;
Schaffrath, Frauke ;
Griesser, Henrik ;
Freudenberg, Nikolaus ;
Doeberitz, Magnus von Knebel .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 119 (01) :98-105
[15]   p16INK4a immunocytochemistry versus human papillomavirus testing for triage of women with minor cytologic abnormalities [J].
Roelens, Jolien ;
Reuschenbach, Miriam ;
Doeberitz, Magnus von Knebel ;
Wentzensen, Nicolas ;
Bergeron, Christine ;
Arbyn, Marc .
CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2012, 120 (05) :294-307
[16]   Are adjunctive markers useful in routine cervical cancer screening?: Application of p16INK4a and HPV-PCR on ThinPrep samples with histological follow-up [J].
Schledermann, D. ;
Andersen, B. T. ;
Bisgaard, K. ;
Dohse, M. ;
Ejersbo, D. ;
Hoelund, B. ;
Horal, P. ;
Lindh, M. ;
Ryd, W. .
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2008, 36 (07) :453-459
[17]   p16/Ki-67 Dual-Stain Cytology in the Triage of ASCUS and LSIL Papanicolaou Cytology Results From the European Equivocal or Mildly Abnormal Papanicolaou Cytology Study [J].
Schmidt, Dietmar ;
Bergeron, Christine ;
Denton, Karin J. ;
Ridder, Ruediger .
CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2011, 119 (03) :158-166
[18]   Immunocytochemical colocalization of p16INK4a and Ki-67 predicts CIN2/3 and AIS/adenocarcinoma Pilot studies [J].
Singh, Meenakshi ;
Mockler, Daniel ;
Akalin, Ali ;
Burke, Stephanie ;
Shroyer, A. Laurie ;
Shroyer, Kenneth R. .
CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2012, 120 (01) :26-34
[19]   Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations - Realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL triage study [J].
Stoler, MH ;
Schiffman, M .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (11) :1500-1505
[20]   Comparison of Predictors for High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women with Abnormal Smears [J].
Szarewski, Anne ;
Ambroisine, Laurence ;
Cadman, Louise ;
Austin, Janet ;
Ho, Linda ;
Terry, George ;
Liddle, Stuart ;
Dina, Roberto ;
McCarthy, Julie ;
Buckley, Hilary ;
Bergeron, Christine ;
Soutter, Pat ;
Lyons, Deirdre ;
Cuzick, Jack .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2008, 17 (11) :3033-3042