A practical approach to communicating benefit-risk decisions of medicines to stakeholders

被引:6
|
作者
Leong, James [1 ]
Walker, Stuart [2 ]
Salek, Sam [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Duke NUS Grad Med Sch, Ctr Regulatory Excellence, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Ctr Innovat Regulatory Sci, London, England
[3] Univ Hertfordshire, Sch Life & Med Sci, Dept Pharm, Hatfield AL10 9AB, Herts, England
[4] Inst Med Dev, Cardiff CF23 6NP, S Glam, Wales
来源
FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY | 2015年 / 6卷
关键词
benefit-risk assessment; benefit-risk methodologies; pharmaceutical industry; regulatory agency; framework; documentation;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2015.00099
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Purpose: The importance of a framework for a systematic structured assessment of the benefits and risks has been established, but in addition, it is necessary that the benefit-risk decisions and the processes to derive those decisions are documented and communicated to various stakeholders for accountability. Hence there is now a need to find appropriate tools to enhance communication between regulators and other stakeholders, in a manner that would uphold transparency, consistency and standards. Methods: A retrospective, non-comparative study was conducted to determine the applicability and practicality of a summary template in documenting benefit-risk assessment and communicating benefit-risk balance and conclusions for reviewers to other stakeholders. The benefit-risk (BR) Summary Template and its User Manual was evaluated by 12 reviewers within a regulatory agency in Singapore, the Health Sciences Authority (HSA). Results: The BR Summary Template was found to be adequate in documenting benefits, risks, relevant summaries and conclusions, while the User Manual was useful in guiding the reviewer in completing the template. The BR Summary Template was also considered a useful tool for communicating benefit-risk decisions to a variety of stakeholders. Conclusions: The use of a template may be of value for the communicating benefit-risk assessment of medicines to stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Development of a Framework for Enhancing the Transparency, Reproducibility and Communication of the Benefit-Risk Balance of Medicines
    Coplan, P. M.
    Noel, R. A.
    Levitan, B. S.
    Ferguson, J.
    Mussen, F.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2011, 89 (02) : 312 - 315
  • [32] Evaluation of Benefit-Risk
    Garattini, Silvio
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2010, 28 (11) : 981 - 986
  • [33] Evaluation of Benefit-Risk
    Silvio Garattini
    PharmacoEconomics, 2010, 28 : 981 - 986
  • [34] Benefit-Risk Analysis for Decision-Making: An Approach
    Raju, G. K.
    Gurumurthi, K.
    Domike, R.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 100 (06) : 654 - 671
  • [35] A Quantitative Approach to Benefit-Risk Assessment: An Example with Lumiracoxib
    Primatesta, Paola
    Plana, Estel
    Moore, Alan
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2011, 20 : S139 - S139
  • [37] Structured Benefit-Risk Assessment Across the Product Lifecycle: Practical Considerations
    Meredith Y. Smith
    Isma Benattia
    Carmit Strauss
    Laura Bloss
    Qi Jiang
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2017, 51 : 501 - 508
  • [38] BRAFO tiered approach for benefit-risk assessment of foods
    Hoekstra, Jeljer
    Hart, Andy
    Boobis, Alan
    Claupein, Erika
    Cockburn, Andrew
    Hunt, Alistair
    Knudsen, Ib
    Richardson, David
    Schilter, Benoit
    Schutte, Katrin
    Torgerson, Paul R.
    Verhagen, Hans
    Watzl, Bernhard
    Chiodini, Alessandro
    FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2012, 50 : S684 - S698
  • [39] Structured Benefit-Risk Assessment Across the Product Lifecycle: Practical Considerations
    Smith, Meredith Y.
    Benattia, Isma
    Strauss, Carmit
    Bloss, Laura
    Jiang, Qi
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2017, 51 (04) : 501 - 508
  • [40] The Benefit-Risk Assessment of Medicines: Experience of a Consortium of Medium-Sized Regulatory Authorities
    McAuslane, Neil
    Leong, James
    Liberti, Lawrence
    Walker, Stuart
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2017, 51 (05) : 635 - 644