Ballot Initiatives and Status Quo Bias

被引:10
作者
Dyck, Joshua J. [1 ,2 ]
Pearson-Merkowitz, Shanna [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Polit Sci, Lowell, MA USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Ctr Publ Opin, Lowell, MA USA
[3] Univ Rhode Isl, Dept Polit Sci, Washburn Hall, Kingston, RI 02881 USA
关键词
direct democracy; political behavior; campaigns; abortion policy; public policy; elections; political communication; DIRECT DEMOCRACY; PROPOSITION; GEOGRAPHY; CHOICES;
D O I
10.1177/1532440018815067
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Is there an opposition bias in ballot initiative campaigns? While some early research suggested that the "no" side was advantaged in ballot initiative campaigns, recent work has demonstrated that both opposition and support spending in ballot measure campaigns are effective. We offer a new way to conceptualize status quo orientation in ballot measure elections. Specifically, we argue that opposition arguments are more effective than support arguments because of the well-known framing negativity bias and not because the starting position for uninformed voters is to default to no. We present the results of two survey experiments to test the impact of support and opposition arguments in ballot initiative campaigns. We find consistent evidence that opposition arguments are effective in generating more "no" votes and that support arguments are ineffective in generating more "yes" votes.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 207
页数:28
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Abortion: Evidence of an issue evolution [J].
Adams, GD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1997, 41 (03) :718-737
[2]   Does Survey Mode Still Matter? Findings from a 2010 Multi-Mode Comparison [J].
Ansolabehere, Stephen ;
Schaffner, Brian F. .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2014, 22 (03) :285-303
[3]   Cooperative Survey Research [J].
Ansolabehere, Stephen ;
Rivers, Douglas .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, VOL 16, 2013, 16 :307-329
[4]   Cognitive Biases and the Strength of Political Arguments [J].
Arceneaux, Kevin .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 56 (02) :271-285
[5]  
Baumeister RF., 2001, Review of General Psychology, V5, P323, DOI [10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323, DOI 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323]
[6]  
Biggers DanielR., 2014, Morality at the Ballot: Direct Democracy and Political Engagement in the United States
[7]  
Binder Mike, 2009, GETTING IT RIGHT PLA
[8]   HOW FRAMES CAN UNDERMINE SUPPORT FOR SCIENTIFIC ADAPTATIONS: POLITICIZATION AND THE STATUS-QUO BIAS [J].
Bolsen, Toby ;
Druckman, James N. ;
Cook, Fay Lomax .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2014, 78 (01) :1-26
[9]  
Bowler Shaun., 1998, Demanding Choices: Opinion, Voting, and Direct Democracy
[10]   When Does Ballot Language Influence Voter Choices? Evidence from a Survey Experiment [J].
Burnett, Craig M. ;
Kogan, Vladimir .
POLITICAL COMMUNICATION, 2015, 32 (01) :109-126