How do high-technology firms create value in international M&A? Integration, autonomy and cross-border contingencies

被引:56
作者
Zhu, Hong [1 ]
Xia, Jun [2 ]
Makino, Shige [3 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, HSBC Business Sch, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Texas Dallas, Jindal Sch Management, Richardson, TX 75080 USA
[3] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Management, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cross-border merger and acquisition; Value creation; Integration; Autonomy; Institutional distance; Language difference; International relations; ACQUISITION EXPERIENCE; CULTURAL-DIFFERENCES; STRATEGY; DISTANCE; ENTRY; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; SUCCESS; CHINA; MATTERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jwb.2015.01.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Managing acquired foreign firms often proves to be a challenging task for the acquiring firms. We propose that industry characteristics are very important to an acquiring firm's actions, suggesting the existence of systematic differences in post-acquisition value creation in different industries. Moreover, the effect of these distinct approaches to value creation is also contingent on the bilateral national relationships of institutional distance, language differences, and diplomatic relationships between the home and host countries of the acquiring and acquired firms. Our study of 847 related cross-border acquisitions in the information technology industry in 27 home countries and 38 host countries provide support for these arguments. Specifically, we found that acquiring firms in service information technology industries where post-acquisition autonomy is more important in value creation outperform those in manufacturing industries where post-acquisition integration is preferred. Results also show institutional distance and language differences strengthen this relationship; in contrast, diplomatic relationships weaken the relationship. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:718 / 728
页数:11
相关论文
共 116 条
[91]  
Prahalad C.K., 1987, The multinational mission
[92]  
Puranam P, 2006, ACAD MANAGE J, V49, P263, DOI 10.2307/20159763
[93]  
Rabe-Hesketh S., 2005, MULTILEVEL LONGITUDI
[94]   The double-edged sword of cultural distance in international acquisitions [J].
Reus, Taco H. ;
Lamont, Bruce T. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2009, 40 (08) :1298-1316
[95]   The foreign service and foreign trade: Embassies as export promotion [J].
Rose, Andrew K. .
WORLD ECONOMY, 2007, 30 (01) :22-38
[96]  
Rumelt Richard., 2011, Good Strategy Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters
[97]   Global standardization as a success formula for marketing in Central Eastern Europe? [J].
Schuh, A .
JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2000, 35 (02) :133-148
[98]   Value creation and destruction in cross-border acquisitions: An empirical analysis of foreign acquisitions of US firms [J].
Seth, A ;
Song, KP ;
Pettit, RR .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2002, 23 (10) :921-940
[99]  
Shimizu K., 2004, J INT MANAG, V10, P307, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.INTMAN.2004.05.005
[100]  
Sirmon DG, 2007, ACAD MANAGE REV, V32, P273, DOI 10.2307/20159292