THE ROLE OF SUPERVISION IN PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIAL WORK SPECIALISTS

被引:40
作者
Caras, Ana [1 ]
Sandu, Antonio [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Alexandru Ioan Cuza Univ, Fac Philosophy & Social Polit Sci, Iasi, Romania
[2] Lumen Res Ctr Social & Humanist Sci, Iasi, Romania
[3] Mihail Kogalniceanu Univ, Iasi, Romania
[4] Gr T Popa Univ Med & Paharm, Project Postdoctoral Studies Domain Eth Hlth Poli, Iasi, Romania
关键词
supervision; professional development; social work; Grounded theory; APPRECIATIVE SUPERVISION;
D O I
10.1080/02650533.2012.763024
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
The professionals use social services supervision as an educational and administrative process, meant to support. Supervision is a relatively new field introduced in the Romanian social welfare institutions. The article approaches the role of supervision in the process of professional development of social workers, following a research based on Grounded theory. We conducted this research into an elite NGO, in the North-Eastern Romania, in the domain of child protection. Supervision is a social practice based on the relationship between a person with extensive professional experience and a professional effectively involved in case management. Supervision is seen as a prerequisite to quality social services organization. Effectiveness of the supervision process may be an indicator of the quality of social work practice in an organization. The data were collected through interviews of participants in the research. The interviewed subjects operate with a definition of the supervision as being a practice based on individual or group interview, formal or informal, consisting in a series of specific phases (initial, development, end). Supervision involves the establishment of professional relationships between the participants and the quality of services and training received. This definition is partially different from those in the literature.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 94
页数:20
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Basics of Qualitative Research
[2]  
[Anonymous], METODE APRECIATIVE A
[3]  
Barker R.L., 1995, SOCIAL WORK DICT, V3rd
[4]  
Bernard JM., 2004, FUNDAMENTALS CLIN SU
[5]  
Bradu OA, 2009, REV CERCET INTERV SO, V24, P95
[6]  
Cojocaru S, 2010, REV CERCET INTERV SO, V29, P72
[7]  
Creswell J. W, 2007, Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches
[8]  
Frunza S, 2011, REV CERCET INTERV SO, V32, P155
[9]  
GOULDING C, 1999, WORKING PAPERS SERIE
[10]   OVERSEEING THE OVERSEER - CONTEXTUALIZING TRAINING IN SUPERVISION [J].
HOLLOWAY, EL .
JOURNAL OF COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 1994, 72 (05) :526-530