Dimensional management for aerospace assemblies: framework implementation with case-based scenarios for simulation and measurement of in-process assembly variations

被引:19
作者
Vichare, Parag [1 ]
Martin, Oliver [2 ]
Jamshidi, Jafar [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ West Scotland, Sch Engn, Paisley PA1 2BE, Renfrew, Scotland
[2] Univ Bath, Dept Mech Engn, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
[3] Coventry Univ, Fac Engn & Comp, Coventry CV1 5FB, W Midlands, England
关键词
Aerospace assembly; Tolerance analysis; Design verification; Metrology; PLM; TOLERANCE ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s00170-013-5262-9
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Tolerances within an assembly are defined during the setting of engineering specifications in the design phase. However, during assembly process execution, certain assembly variations arise from the individual components, manufacturing imperfections, material compliance, the means by which they are fastened and the assembly sequence used. The implementation work reported in this article utilises in-process assembly measurement information for predicting dimensional variation of the aero structure assembly process. A framework is exploited in the case study for predicting the dimensional influence of (1) designed tolerances, (2) designed assembly processes and (3) component and sub-assembly level measurement data for revising the assembly sequence if any concessions were issued on manufactured components. Considerable learnings are achieved while managing dimensional variation of in-process aerospace assembly structure. Dimensional variation simulation is found to be overestimating variation spread even after considering compliance of non-rigid components. Thus, in-process measurement data (component and sub-assembly level) has to be integrated in the variation analysis in order to reduce variation spectrum. Case-based scenarios are discussed where design and measurement data can be utilised for estimating dimensional variation of the in-process assembly.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 225
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Brujic D, 2005, 235IMPERIALT0550311
[2]   Optimization of aircraft fuselage assembly process using digital manufacturing [J].
Butterfield, J. ;
Crosby, S. ;
Curran, R. ;
Price, M. ;
Armstrong, C. G. ;
Raghunathan, S. ;
McAleenan, D. ;
Gibson, C. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING, 2007, 7 (03) :269-275
[3]   An Integrated Lean Approach to Aerospace Assembly Jig and Work Cell Design Using Digital Manufacturing [J].
Butterfield, J. ;
McClean, A. ;
Yin, Y. ;
Curran, R. ;
Burke, R. ;
Welch, Brian ;
Devenny, C. .
COLLABORATIVE PRODUCTIVE AND SERVICE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT FOR A SUSTAINABLE WORLD, 2008, :531-+
[4]  
Hartmann J, 2004, 200420012832 SAE
[5]   Modeling and control of compliant assembly systems [J].
Hu, S. Jack ;
Camelio, Jaime .
CIRP ANNALS-MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 55 (01) :19-22
[6]   Manufacturing and assembly automation by integrated metrology systems for aircraft wing fabrication [J].
Jamshidi, J. ;
Kayani, A. ;
Iravani, P. ;
Maropoulos, P. G. ;
Summers, M. D. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART B-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MANUFACTURE, 2010, 224 (B1) :25-36
[7]   Adaptive robotic assembly of compliant aero-structure components [J].
Jayaweera, Nirosh ;
Webb, Phil .
ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2007, 23 (02) :180-194
[8]   Measurement assisted robotic assembly of fabricated aero-engine components [J].
Jayaweera, Nirosh ;
Webb, Phil ;
Johnson, Craig .
ASSEMBLY AUTOMATION, 2010, 30 (01) :56-65
[9]   Theoretical tolerance stackup analysis based on tolerance zone analysis [J].
Lin, EE ;
Zhang, HC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 17 (04) :257-262
[10]   Early design verification of complex assembly variability using a Hybrid-Model Based and Physical Testing-Methodology [J].
Maropoulos, P. G. ;
Vichare, P. ;
Martin, O. ;
Muelaner, J. ;
Summers, M. D. ;
Kayani, A. .
CIRP ANNALS-MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 60 (01) :207-210