Institutional selectivity and good practices in undergraduate education: How strong is the link?

被引:61
作者
Pascarella, ET [1 ]
Cruce, T
Umbach, PD
Wolniak, GC
Kuh, GD
Carini, RM
Hayek, JC
Gonyea, RM
Zhao, CM
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Ctr Res Undergrad Educ, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Ctr Postsecondary Res, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[3] Human Capital Res Corp, Evanston, IL USA
[4] Univ Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1353/jhe.2006.0016
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Academic selectivity plays a dominant role in the public's understanding of what constitutes institutional excellence or quality in Undergraduate education. In this study, we analyzed two independent data sets to estimate the net effect of three measures of college selectivity on dimensions of documented good practices in Undergraduate education. With statistical controls in place for important confounding influences, an institution's median student SAT/ACT score, a nearly identical proxy for that score, and the Barron's Selectivity Score explained from less than 0. 1% to 20% of the between-institution variance and from less than 0. 1% to 2.7% of the total variance in good practices. The implications of these findings for what constitutes quality in undergraduate education, college choice decisions, and the validity of national college rankings are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / +
页数:36
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
*ACT, 1990, REP TECHN CHAR CAAP
[2]  
Anaya G, 1996, J COLL STUDENT DEV, V37, P611
[3]  
ANAYA G, 1999, ANN M AM ED RES ASS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1991, INVOLVING COLL
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1993, WHAT MATTERS COLL
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1993, LONG TERM CHANGES AC
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2003, J COLL STUDENT DEV, DOI DOI 10.1353/CSD.2003.0027
[8]  
[Anonymous], THESIS U CALIFORNIA
[9]  
[Anonymous], HIGHER ED HDB THEORY
[10]  
ARCIDIACONO P, 1998, UNPUB OPTION VALUES