Testing the focal species approach to making conservation decisions for species persistence

被引:42
作者
Nicholson, Emily [1 ,2 ]
Lindenmayer, David B. [3 ,4 ]
Frank, Karin [5 ]
Possingham, Hugh P. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Sch Bot, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Div Biol, Ascot SL5 7PY, Berks, England
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, ARC Ctr Excellence Environm Decis, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[4] Australian Natl Univ, Natl Environm Res Program, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[5] Helmholz Ctr Environm Res UFZ, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[6] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, ARC Ctr Excellence Environm Decis, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[7] Univ Queensland, Natl Environm Res Program, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
Conservation planning; extinction risk; focal species; indicator species; metapopulation; population viability analysis; POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS; SPATIAL PVA MODELS; UMBRELLA; BIODIVERSITY; LESSONS; METAPOPULATIONS; SENSITIVITY; EXTINCTION; MANAGEMENT; MARSUPIALS;
D O I
10.1111/ddi.12066
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Aim Most risk assessments and decisions in conservation are based on surrogate approaches, where a group of species or environmental indicators are selected as proxies for other aspects of biodiversity. In the focal species approach, a suite of species is selected based on life history characteristics, such as dispersal limitation and area requirements. Testing the validity of the focal species concept has proved difficult, due to a lack of theory justifying the underlying framework, explicit objectives and measures of success. We sought to understand the conditions under which the focal species concept has merit for conservation decisions. Location Our model system comprised 10 vertebrate species in 39 patches of native forest embedded in pine plantation in New South Wales, Australia. Methods We selected three focal species based on ecological traits. We used a multiple-species reserve selection method that minimizes the expected loss of species, by estimating the risk of extinction with a metapopulation model. We found optimal reserve solutions for multiple species, including all 10 species, the three focal species, for all possible combinations of three species, and for each species individually. Results Our case study suggests that the focal species approach can work: the reserve system that minimized the expected loss of the focal species also minimized the expected species loss in the larger set of 10 species. How well the solution would perform for other species and given landscape dynamics remains unknown. Main conclusions The focal species approach may have merit as a conservation short cut if placed within a quantitative decision-making framework, where the aspects of biodiversity for which the focal species act as proxies are explicitly defined, and success is determined by whether the use of the proxy results in the same decision. Our methods provide a framework for testing other surrogate approaches used in conservation decision-making and risk assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:530 / 540
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Status and priority conservation actions for Australian frog species
    Gillespie, Graeme R.
    Roberts, J. Dale
    Hunter, David
    Hoskin, Conrad J.
    Alford, Ross A.
    Heard, Geoffrey W.
    Hines, Harry
    Lemckert, Frank
    Newell, David
    Scheele, Benjamin C.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2020, 247
  • [42] Conservation implications of species-genetic diversity correlations
    Kahilainen, Aapo
    Puurtinen, Mikael
    Kotiaho, Janne S.
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2014, 2 : 315 - 323
  • [43] The application of predictive modelling of species distribution to biodiversity conservation
    Paul Rodriguez, Jon
    Brotons, Lluis
    Bustamante, Javier
    Seoane, Javier
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2007, 13 (03) : 243 - 251
  • [44] Structural factors influencing conservation decision-making: a case of species prioritisation in Australia
    Kim, Milena Kiatkoski
    Evans, Louisa
    Fidelman, Pedro
    Scherl, Lea M.
    Marsh, Helene
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 60 (11) : 1923 - 1943
  • [45] Long-term persistence of conservation-reliant species: Challenges and opportunities
    Gameiro, Joao
    Franco, Aldina M. A.
    Catry, Teresa
    Palmeirim, Jorge M.
    Catry, Ines
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2020, 243
  • [46] Racing against change: understanding dispersal and persistence to improve species' conservation prospects
    Kerr, Jeremy T.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 287 (1939)
  • [47] An objective approach to select surrogate species for connectivity conservation
    Dutta, Trishna
    De Barba, Marta
    Selva, Nuria
    Fedorca, Ancuta Cotovelea
    Maiorano, Luigi
    Thuiller, Wilfried
    Zedrosser, Andreas
    Signer, Johannes
    Pflueger, Femke
    Frank, Shane
    Lucas, Pablo M.
    Balkenhol, Niko
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 11
  • [48] How decisions about fitting species distribution models affect conservation outcomes
    Muscatello, Angela
    Elith, Jane
    Kujala, Heini
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2021, 35 (04) : 1309 - 1320
  • [49] Conservation of food tree species in Niger: towards a participatory approach in rural communities
    Agundez, Dolores
    Douma, Soumana
    Madrigal, Javier
    Gomez-Ramos, Almudena
    Vinceti, Barbara
    Alia, Ricardo
    Mahamane, Ali
    FOREST SYSTEMS, 2016, 25 (03)
  • [50] How to ensure threatened species monitoring leads to threatened species conservation
    Robinson, Natasha M.
    Scheele, Ben C.
    Legge, Sarah
    Southwell, Darren M.
    Carter, Oberon
    Lintermans, Mark
    Radford, James Q.
    Skroblin, Anja
    Dickman, Chris R.
    Koleck, Jessica
    Wayne, Adrian F.
    Kanowski, John
    Gillespie, Graeme R.
    Lindenmayer, David B.
    ECOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT & RESTORATION, 2018, 19 (03) : 222 - 229