DNA damage tolerance: a double-edged sword guarding the genome

被引:168
作者
Ghosal, Gargi [1 ]
Chen, Junjie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Expt Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
DNA damage tolerance (DDT); proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA); replicative DNA polymerase; stalled replication forks; translesion synthesis (TLS); translesion polymerase;
D O I
10.3978/j.issn.2218-676X.2013.04.01
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Preservation of genome integrity is an essential process for cell homeostasis. During the course of life of a single cell, the genome is constantly damaged by endogenous and exogenous agents. To ensure genome stability, cells use a global signaling network, namely the DNA damage response (DDR) to sense and repair DNA damage. DDR senses different types of DNA damage and coordinates a response that includes activation of transcription, cell cycle control, DNA repair pathways, apoptosis, senescence, and cell death. Despite several repair mechanisms that repair different types of DNA lesions, it is likely that the replication machinery would still encounter lesions that are mis-repaired or not repaired. Replication of damaged genome would result in high frequency of fork collapse and genome instability. In this scenario, the cells employ the DNA damage tolerance (DDT) pathway that recruits a specialized low fidelity translesion synthesis (TLS) polymerase to bypass the lesions for repair at a later time point. Thus, DDT is not a repair pathway per se, but provides a mechanism to tolerate DNA lesions during replication thereby increasing survival and preventing genome instability. Paradoxically, DDT process is also associated with increased mutagenesis, which can in turn drive the cell to cancer development. Thus, DDT process functions as a double-edged sword guarding the genome. In this review, we will discuss the replication stress induced DNA damage-signaling cascade, the stabilization and rescue of stalled replication forks by the DDT pathway and the effect of the DDT pathway on cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 129
页数:23
相关论文
共 224 条
[1]   The overexpression of specialized DNA polymerases in cancer [J].
Albertella, MR ;
Lau, A ;
O'Connor, MJ .
DNA REPAIR, 2005, 4 (05) :583-593
[2]   FAAP20: a novel ubiquitin-binding FA nuclear core-complex protein required for functional integrity of the FA-BRCA DNA repair pathway [J].
Ali, Abdullah Mahmood ;
Pradhan, Arun ;
Singh, Thiyam Ramsingh ;
Du, Changhu ;
Li, Jie ;
Wahengbam, Kebola ;
Grassman, Elke ;
Auerbach, Arleen D. ;
Pang, Qishen ;
Meetei, Amom Ruhikanta .
BLOOD, 2012, 119 (14) :3285-3294
[3]   Eukaryotic DNA damage tolerance and translesion syntheses through covalent modifications of PCNA [J].
Andersen, Parker L. ;
Xu, Fang ;
Xiao, Wei .
CELL RESEARCH, 2008, 18 (01) :162-173
[4]   Drosophila MUS312 and the Vertebrate Ortholog BTBD12 Interact with DNA Structure-Specific Endonucleases in DNA Repair and Recombination [J].
Andersen, Sabrina L. ;
Bergstralh, Daniel T. ;
Kohl, Kathryn P. ;
LaRocque, Jeannine R. ;
Moore, Chris B. ;
Sekelsky, Jeff .
MOLECULAR CELL, 2009, 35 (01) :128-135
[5]   Replication fork reversal and the maintenance of genome stability [J].
Atkinson, John ;
McGlynn, Peter .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2009, 37 (11) :3475-3492
[6]   RecQ helicases: guardian angels of the DNA replication fork [J].
Bachrati, Csanad Z. ;
Hickson, Ian D. .
CHROMOSOMA, 2008, 117 (03) :219-233
[7]   The annealing helicase SMARCAL1 maintains genome integrity at stalled replication forks [J].
Bansbach, Carol E. ;
Betous, Remy ;
Lovejoy, Courtney A. ;
Glick, Gloria G. ;
Cortez, David .
GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 23 (20) :2405-2414
[8]   DNA damage signalling guards against activated oncogenes and tumour progression [J].
Bartek, J. ;
Bartkova, J. ;
Lukas, J. .
ONCOGENE, 2007, 26 (56) :7773-7779
[9]   Mammalian G1- and S-phase checkpoints in response to DNA damage [J].
Bartek, J ;
Lukas, J .
CURRENT OPINION IN CELL BIOLOGY, 2001, 13 (06) :738-747
[10]   Chk1 and Chk2 kinases in checkpoint control and cancer [J].
Bartek, J ;
Lukas, J .
CANCER CELL, 2003, 3 (05) :421-429