Rice-Straw-Based Heat Generation System Compared to Open-Field Burning and Soil Incorporation of Rice Straw: An Assessment of Energy, GHG Emissions, and Economic Impacts

被引:19
作者
Migo-Sumagang, Maria Victoria P. [1 ,2 ]
Maguyon-Detras, Monet Concepcion [2 ]
Gummert, Martin [1 ]
Alfafara, Catalino G. [2 ]
Borines, Myra G. [2 ]
Capunitan, Jewel A. [2 ]
Van Hung, Nguyen [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Rice Res Inst, DAPO Box 7777, Manila 1301, Philippines
[2] Univ Philippines Los Banos, Coll Engn & Agroind Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Los Banos 4031, Laguna, Philippines
关键词
rice straw; bioenergy; furnace; net energy balance; Net GHG emissions; Life Cycle Assessment; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; EMBODIED ENERGY; CONSTRUCTION; CONSUMPTION; EFFICIENCY; RESIDUES; RESOURCE; PROVINCE; TOWN; GAS;
D O I
10.3390/su12135327
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Rice is a staple food crop, and its production generates large volumes of agricultural waste, rice straw. Several studies have proven that open-field burning and soil incorporation are unsustainable practices of managing rice straw, but remain as prevalent methods of treating and disposing of rice straw. An alternative solution is to harness the energy from rice straw via a small-scale heat conversion system for paddy drying applications, which can reduce rice grain post-processing costs and improve paddy storage conditions. This study investigated the energy flow, Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions, and cost of a small-scale rice-straw-based heat generation (RBHG) system using a downdraft furnace and a dryer simulator setup. The highest input energy and GHG emissions of 92% and 68%, respectively, were from the heat generation stage. The RBHG energy ratio was between 1.4 and 1.7, and the percent net energy was between 39 and 67%. The best case of RBHG offers a possibility of a net GHG avoided (-61 kg CO2-eq Mg-1), while the worst case (856 kg CO2-eq Mg-1) has a net GHG emission comparable with soil incorporation. The average total cost of RBHG is 0.096 USD kWh(-1). Overall, RBHG technology has the potential to improve energy flow, GHG emissions, and the cost of rice production systems.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Energy use pattern in rice production: A case study from Mazandaran province, Iran [J].
AghaAlikhani, M. ;
Kazemi-Poshtmasari, H. ;
Habibzadeh, F. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 69 :157-162
[2]  
[Anonymous], ENERGY FARM PRODUCTI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Letter to Speakers Task Force on Intergovernmental Affairs
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, XE currency converter
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, SUMM MET VAL OCC
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, IND DAT 2 0
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2016, PRECONSULTANTS SIMAP
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2017, SIMAPRO VERS 8 0 5 1
[9]   Greenhouse gas emissions from rice straw burning and straw-mushroom cultivation in a triple rice cropping system in the Mekong Delta [J].
Arai, Hironori ;
Hosen, Yasukazu ;
Van Nguyen Pham Hong ;
Nga Truong Thi ;
Chiem Nguyen Huu ;
Inubushi, Kazuyuki .
SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 2015, 61 (04) :719-735
[10]  
Bautista EG, 2010, PHILIPP AGRIC SCI, V93, P346