A study of the impacts of flow direction and electrical constraints on vulnerability assessment of power grid using electrical betweenness measures

被引:21
作者
Wu, Di [1 ]
Ma, Feng [2 ]
Javadi, Milad [1 ]
Thulasiraman, Krishnaiya [3 ]
Bompard, Ettore [4 ]
Jiang, John N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[2] OGE Energy Corp, Oklahoma City, OK 73172 USA
[3] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Comp Sci, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[4] Polytech Univ Turin, Dept Energy, I-10129 Turin, Italy
关键词
Power grid vulnerability; Complex network; Betweenness centrality; CASCADING FAILURES; NETWORKS; MODEL; METRICS; LINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.physa.2016.09.029
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
In this paper, we analyze the impacts of major electrical properties, including node constraints, line limits, and flow direction, on vulnerability assessment of power grid using several types of electrical betweenness measures. Specifically, we first propose a set of new electrical betweenness measures, which takes into account flow direction in power grids. Then, the impacts of major electrical properties on vulnerability assessment of power grid are analyzed by comparing the identification results of critical components based on the proposed electrical betweenness measures with those based on the other two types of electrical betweenness measures reported in the literature, which take into consideration node constraints and line limits, respectively. Analysis results show the important impact of flow direction on the identification of critical components. The results lead us to introduce a set of combined electrical betweenness measures that take into account node constraints, line limits, and flow direction together. Simulation results on the IEEE 300-bus system and the Italian power grid show that the combined electrical betweenness measures are superior in identifying critical components and more useful in assessing power grid vulnerability. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 309
页数:15
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Structural vulnerability of the North American power grid [J].
Albert, R ;
Albert, I ;
Nakarado, GL .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2004, 69 (02) :025103-1
[2]   Classes of small-world networks [J].
Amaral, LAN ;
Scala, A ;
Barthélémy, M ;
Stanley, HE .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2000, 97 (21) :11149-11152
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, LARGE SCALE STRUCTUR
[4]  
[Anonymous], ARXIV09091664
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, J GUANGDONG TECHNICA, DOI DOI 10.1109/ICMULT.2010.5631429)
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Random graphs
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2011, THESIS
[8]   Power grid vulnerability: A complex network approach [J].
Arianos, S. ;
Bompard, E. ;
Carbone, A. ;
Xue, F. .
CHAOS, 2009, 19 (01)
[9]   Emergence of scaling in random networks [J].
Barabási, AL ;
Albert, R .
SCIENCE, 1999, 286 (5439) :509-512
[10]   Performance of Electric Power Systems Under Physical Malicious Attacks [J].
Bilis, Evangelos I. ;
Kroeger, Wolfgang ;
Nan, Cen .
IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2013, 7 (04) :854-865