MHGEE: Event Extraction via Multi-granularity Heterogeneous Graph

被引:2
作者
Zhang, Mingyu [1 ,2 ]
Fang, Fang [1 ,2 ]
Li, Hao [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Qingyun [1 ,2 ]
Li, Yangchun [3 ]
Wang, Hailong [3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Informat Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Cyber Secur, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Cyberspace Studies, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE - ICCS 2022, PT I | 2022年
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Event extraction; Heterogeneous graph; R-GCN;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-08751-6_34
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Event extraction is a key task of information extraction. Existing methods are not effective due to two challenges of this task: 1) Most of previous methods only consider a single granularity information and they are often insufficient to distinguish ambiguity of triggers for some types of events. 2) The correlation among intra-sentence and inter-sentence event is non-trivial to model. Previous methods are weak in modeling interdependency among the correlated events and they have never modeled this problem for the whole event extraction task. In this paper, we propose a novel Multi-granularity Heterogeneous Graph-based event extraction model (MHGEE) to solve the two problems simultaneously. For the first challenge, MHGEE constructs multi-granularity nodes, including word, entity and context and captures interactions among nodes by R-GCN. It can strengthen semantic and distinguish ambiguity of triggers. For the second, MHGEE uses heterogeneous graph neural network to aggregating the information of relevant events and hence capture the interdependency among the events. The experiment results on ACE 2005 dataset demonstrate that our proposed MHGEE model achieves competitive results compared with state-of-the-art methods in event extraction. Then we demonstrate the effectiveness of our model in ambiguity of triggers and event interdependency.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 487
页数:15
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Chen YB, 2015, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 53RD ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS AND THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING, VOL 1, P167
[2]  
Cui SY, 2020, FINDINGS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, EMNLP 2020, P2329
[3]  
Du X, 2020, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 CONFERENCE ON EMPIRICAL METHODS IN NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING (EMNLP), P671
[4]  
Kipf ThomasN., 2016, CORR
[5]  
Li Q., 2013, PROC ANN M ASS COMPU, P73
[6]  
Liao SS, 2010, ACL 2010: 48TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, P789
[7]  
Liu SL, 2016, AAAI CONF ARTIF INTE, P2993
[8]  
Liu X, 2018, 2018 CONFERENCE ON EMPIRICAL METHODS IN NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING (EMNLP 2018), P1247
[9]  
Lu YJ, 2021, 59TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS AND THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING (ACL-IJCNLP 2021), VOL 1, P2795
[10]  
Nguyen T.H., 2016, PROC 2016 C N AM CHA, P300, DOI DOI 10.18653/V1/N16-1034