Comparative life cycle environmental impacts of two scenarios for managing an organic fraction of municipal solid waste in Rasht-Iran

被引:39
作者
Behrooznia, Leyla [1 ]
Sharifi, Mohammad [1 ]
Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Fac Agr Engn & Technol, Dept Agr Machinery Engn, Karaj, Iran
关键词
Municipal solid waste; Composting; Anaerobic digestion; Environmental impacts; Life cycle assessment; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; ASSESSMENT LCA; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; MILL WASTE; MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; ELECTRICITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122217
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Population growth and increasing rapidly expanding urbanization in developing countries have led to an increase in municipal solid waste. Accordingly, the municipal solid waste management is a challenging and revolute issue which requires more informed decision making by authorities and experts from a variety of perspectives. Various methods have been suggested for the treatment of municipal solid waste to solve the problems and challenges. However, environmental sustainability should be considered by decision-makers in different ways. The life cycle assessment as a tool can help authorities and experts in the selection of stability methods of municipal solid waste management. Therefore, the objective of this study is to evaluate and compare two scenarios, namely, composting and anaerobic digestion, for managing the organic fraction of municipal solid waste of Rasht city, Iran from an environmental sustainability perspective. Life cycle assessment was used to evaluate the environmental impact of composting and anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste. In this study, the functional unit is defined as 100 t municipal solid waste and the system boundaries include all proceedings for municipal solid waste transportation from the city to the end of the production process in each scenario. The results showed that the treatment of organic wastes by the anaerobic digestion scenario compared with the composting scenario leads to a reduction of 66.67% in damage to human health, 47.84% in damage to ecosystem quality, and 89.64% in the climate change. Also, the result represents that the treatment of organic wastes by the anaerobic digestion scenario leads to a redaction 21 times in damage to resources compared with when organic wastes are treated by composting scenario. More specifically, the presented results in this study showed anaerobic digestion scenario owing to the treatment of organic wastes and convert them into value-added material/energy has favorable environmental impacts. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 74 条
[41]   Mechanical-biological treatment: Performance and potentials. An LCA of 8 MBT plants including waste characterization [J].
Montejo, Cristina ;
Tonini, Davide ;
del Carmen Marquez, Maria ;
Astrup, Thomas Fruergaard .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 128 :661-673
[42]   Life-cycle assessment of a Solar Assist Plug-in Hybrid electric Tractor (SAPHT) in comparison with a conventional tractor [J].
Mousazadeh, Hossein ;
Keyhani, Alireza ;
Javadi, Arzhang ;
Mobli, Hossein ;
Abrinia, Karen ;
Sharifi, Ahmad .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 52 (03) :1700-1710
[43]  
Muthu S.S., 2014, Assessing the Environmental Impact of Textiles and the Clothing Supply Chain, P105, DOI DOI 10.1533/9781782421122.105
[44]   Modeling of energy consumption and environmental life cycle assessment for incineration and landfill systems of municipal solid waste management - A case study in Tehran Metropolis of Iran [J].
Nabavi-Pelesaraei, Ashkan ;
Bayat, Reza ;
Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa ;
Afrasyabi, Hadi ;
Chau, Kwok-Wing .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 148 :427-440
[45]   Energy consumption projection of Nepal: An econometric approach [J].
Parajuli, Ranjan ;
Ostergaard, Poul Alberg ;
Dalgaard, Tommy ;
Pokharel, Govind Raj .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2014, 63 :432-444
[46]   Biogas production from co-digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste and fruit and vegetable waste [J].
Pavi, Suelen ;
Kramer, Luis Eduardo ;
Gomes, Luciana Paulo ;
Schiavo Miranda, Luis Alcides .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 228 :362-367
[47]   Utilizing recycled PET blends with demolition wastes as construction materials [J].
Perera, Sahan ;
Arulrajah, Arul ;
Wong, Yat Choy ;
Horpibulsuk, Suksun ;
Maghool, Farshid .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2019, 221 :200-209
[48]   Biomass sources for a sustainable energy supply in Ghana - A case study for Sunyani [J].
Praeger, Fabian ;
Paczkowski, Sebastian ;
Sailer, Gregor ;
Derkyi, Nana Sarfo Agyemang ;
Pelz, Stefan .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 107 :413-424
[49]   Challenges in Environmental Sustainability of renewable energy options in Singapore [J].
Quek, Augustine ;
Ee, Alvin ;
Ng, Adam ;
Wah, Tong Yen .
ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 122 :388-394
[50]   Electricity generation and GHG emission reduction potentials through different municipal solid waste management technologies: A comparative review [J].
Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali ;
Ghanavati, Hossein ;
Dashti, Behrouz B. ;
Heijungs, Reinout ;
Aghbashlo, Mortaza ;
Tabatabaei, Meisam .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 79 :414-439