Does double-blind review benefit female authors?

被引：62

作者：

Webb, Thomas J. ^{[1
]}

O'Hara, Bob ^{[2
]}

Freckleton, Robert P. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Anim & Plant Sci, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England

[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Math & Stat, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland

来源：

关键词：

D O I：

10.1016/j.tree.2008.03.003

中图分类号：

Q14 [生态学（生物生态学）];

学科分类号：

071012 ; 0713 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：351 / 353

页数：3

共 11 条

[1] Best tests for candidates
不详
[J]. NATURE, 2008, 451 (7179) : 605 - 605
[2] [Anonymous], B BRIT ECOLOGICAL SO
[3] Bates D., 2005, R NEWS, V5, P27, DOI DOI 10.1159/000323281
[4] Bentley JT., 2003, Gender differences in the careers of academic scientists and engineers: A literature review: National Science Foundation
[5] BLANK RM, 1991, AM ECON REV, V81, P1041
[6] Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors
Budden, Amber E.
Tregenza, Tom
Aarssen, Lonnie W.
Koricheva, Julia
Leimu, Roosa
Lortie, Christopher J.
[J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2008, 23 (01) : 4 - 6
[7] Ceci S.J., 2007, WHY ARENT MORE WOMEN
[8] Greenfield S., 2002, SET fair: A Report on Women in Science, Engineering and Technology from the Baroness Greenfield CBE to the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
[9] Monkman M, 2008, PEER REV SCHOLARLY J
[10] R Core Team, 2016, R LANG ENV STAT COMP