Business undergraduates' progress and satisfaction with learning experiences: the role of group assessment

被引:3
作者
Gamlath, Sharmila [1 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Learning & Teaching Unit, Student Success Grp, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Business students; group assessment; student satisfaction; survey response rate; curriculum design; AFFECTING RESPONSE RATES; GROUP WORK; CLASS SIZE; INVOLVEMENT; ATTITUDES; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1080/02602938.2020.1776839
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Summative group assessment is increasingly used to prepare undergraduates for employment by developing their communication, interpersonal and teamworking capabilities. This article examined the effects of group assessment on progress rates and satisfaction among undergraduates by analysing the results of two surveys deployed by the Business School of a large Australian technology university early on and towards the end of semester 1, 2018. Results revealed that subjects/units with group assessment had higher progress rates compared to those with individual assessment. In addition, the response rate to the first survey was negatively related to progress rate, and there were also differences in progress rates between disciplines. However, there were no notable differences in student satisfaction levels for units with group assessment compared to those without group assessment, and the only significant predictors of student satisfaction were the proportion of part-time students and the staff-to-student ratio. Units with group assessment also had a relatively lower response rate for the first survey and a higher response rate for the second survey. This article highlights the importance of group assessment in shaping student progression and satisfaction whilst acknowledging other factors that educators need to consider when designing curriculum and providing timely support to students.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 375
页数:16
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Nonresponse and Online Student Evaluations of Teaching: Understanding the Influence of Salience, Fatigue, and Academic Environments [J].
Adams, Meredith J. D. ;
Umbach, Paul D. .
RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2012, 53 (05) :576-591
[2]   Group assessment: comparing group and individual undergraduate module marks [J].
Almond, Richard J. .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2009, 34 (02) :141-148
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, MARKET RES SOC J, DOI DOI 10.1177/147078539403600404
[4]  
Australian Qualifications Framework, 2013, AQF LEV QUAL TYP DES
[5]   Grade inflation in UK higher education [J].
Bachan, Ray .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 42 (08) :1580-1600
[6]  
Bacon D.R., 2016, Marketing Education Review, V26, P93, DOI DOI 10.1080/10528008.2016.1166442
[7]  
Boud D., 2000, STUD CONTIN EDUC, V22, P151, DOI [DOI 10.1080/713695728, 10.1080/713695728]
[8]  
Boud D., 2006, ASSESS EVAL HIGH EDU, V31, P399, DOI [DOI 10.1080/02602930600679050, https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600679050, 10.1080/02602930600679050]
[9]  
Brooks C.M., 2003, J EDUC BUS, V78, P268, DOI DOI 10.1080/08832320309598613
[10]  
Burdett J, 2009, J UNIV TEACH LEARN P, V6