Quantitative effects of glass roof system parameters on energy and daylighting performances: A bi-objective optimal design using response surface methodology

被引:10
作者
Yu, Fei [1 ]
Leng, Jiawei [1 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Architecture, 2 Sipailou, Nanjing 210018, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Glass roof system; Total energy demand; Useful daylight illuminance; Bi-objective optimal design; Response surface methodology; Energy-efficient; OPTIMIZATION; BUILDINGS; SIMULATION; CONSUMPTION; ILLUMINANCE; STRATEGY; CLIMATE; CHINA;
D O I
10.1177/1420326X20941220
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In regions with a hot-summer/cold-winter climate, a balance between energy-saving and better daylighting performance is often required for the design of a glass roof system. This research aims to reduce the total energy demand and to increase the useful daylight illuminance (UDI), by introducing a response-surface-methodology-based bi-objective optimization approach for three glass roof system models (no shading, exterior blinds, interior shades). Surrogate models were generated to quantify the effect of the glazing material and shading parameters. Our findings have revealed that, in hot-summer/cold-winter climate regions like Nanjing, properties of the glazing material could substitute the effect of shading parameters to enhance energy-saving potentials. However, the use of glazing cannot make up for the effect on the daylight performance. Glass roof systems with a lowU-value glazing material and small-slat exterior blinds are generally recommended as the balanced solution to lower the energy demand and raise theUDI(200-2000). The substitute relations introduced in the surrogate models and optimal solutions have indicated that there are multiple choices to attain a relatively similar goal to produce an energy-efficient building design for construction.
引用
收藏
页码:1268 / 1285
页数:18
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Al-Obaidi KM, 2016, INT J SUSTAIN BUILD, V6, P236
[2]  
American National Standard, 2017, 552017 ASHRAE AM NAT
[3]  
American National Standard, 2014, 18912014 ASHRAE AM N
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, JIANGS NANJ 582380 C
[5]   DAY LIGHTING AS A FACTOR IN OPTIMIZING ENERGY PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS [J].
ARUMI, F .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 1977, 1 (02) :175-182
[6]   Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology [J].
Bas, Deniz ;
Boyaci, Ismail H. .
JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING, 2007, 78 (03) :836-845
[7]   Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry [J].
Bezerra, Marcos Almeida ;
Santelli, Ricardo Erthal ;
Oliveira, Eliane Padua ;
Villar, Leonardo Silveira ;
Escaleira, Luciane Amlia .
TALANTA, 2008, 76 (05) :965-977
[8]   Thermal comfort evaluation for mechanically conditioned buildings using response surfaces in an uncertainty analysis framework [J].
Cetin, Kristen S. ;
Manuel, Lance ;
Novoselac, Atila .
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 22 (02) :140-152
[9]   Performance of skylight illuminance inside a dome shaped adobe house under composite climate at New Delhi (India): A typical zero energy passive house [J].
Chel, Arvind .
ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2014, 53 (02) :385-397
[10]   Multipurpose characterization of glazing systems with silica aerogel: In-field experimental analysis of thermal-energy, lighting and acoustic performance [J].
Cotana, Franco ;
Pisello, Anna Laura ;
Moretti, Elisa ;
Buratti, Cinzia .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 81 :92-102