On the influence of assumed drop size distribution form on radar-retrieved thunderstorm microphysics

被引:19
作者
Brandes, EA [1 ]
Zhang, GF [1 ]
Sun, JZ [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1175/JAM2335.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Polarimetric radar measurements are used to retrieve drop size distributions (DSD) in subtropical thunderstorms. Retrievals are made with the single-moment exponential drop size model of Marshall and Palmer driven by radar reflectivity measurements and with a two-parameter constrained-gamma drop size model that utilizes reflectivity and differential reflectivity. Results are compared with disdrometer observations. Retrievals with the constrained-gamma DSD model gave better representation of total drop concentration, liquid water content, and drop median volume diameter and better described their natural variability. The Marshall-Palmer DSD model, with a fixed intercept parameter, tended to underestimate the total drop concentration in storm cores and to overestimate significantly the concentration in stratiform regions. Rainwater contents in strong convection were underestimated by a factor of 2-3, and drop median volume diameters in stratiform rain were underestimated by 0.5 mm. To determine possible DSD model impacts on numerical forecasts, evaporation and accretion rates were computed using Kessler-type parameterizations. Rates based on the Marshall-Palmer DSD model were lower by a factor of 2-3 in strong convection and were higher by about a factor of 2 in stratiform rain than those based on the constrained-gamma model. The study demonstrates the potential of polarimetric radar measurements for improving the understanding of precipitation processes and microphysics parameterization in numerical forecast models.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 268
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Brandes EA, 2005, J APPL METEOROL, V44, P186, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(2005)44<186:C>2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]   Freezing-level estimation with polarimetric radar [J].
Brandes, EA ;
Ikeda, K .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY, 2004, 43 (11) :1541-1553
[4]  
Brandes EA, 2004, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V21, P584, DOI 10.1175/1520-0426(2004)021<0584:COPRDS>2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]  
Brandes EA, 2004, J APPL METEOROL, V43, P461, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(2004)043<0461:DSDRWP>2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[8]  
Brandes EA, 2003, J APPL METEOROL, V42, P652, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<0652:AEOADD>2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]  
Brandes EA, 2002, J APPL METEOROL, V41, P674, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(2002)041<0674:EIREWA>2.0.CO