Trends in Prokaryotic Evolution Revealed by Comparison of Closely Related Bacterial and Archaeal Genomes

被引:103
|
作者
Novichkov, Pavel S. [1 ]
Wolf, Yuri I. [1 ]
Dubchak, Inna [2 ,3 ]
Koonin, Eugene V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Lib Med, Natl Ctr Biotechnol Informat, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20894 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Joint Genome Inst, Dept Energy, Walnut Creek, CA 94598 USA
关键词
GENE ORDER; ALIGNMENT; DATABASE;
D O I
10.1128/JB.01237-08
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
In order to explore microevolutionary trends in bacteria and archaea, we constructed a data set of 41 alignable tight genome clusters (ATGCs). We show that the ratio of the medians of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitution rates (dN/dS) that is used as a measure of the purifying selection pressure on protein sequences is a stable characteristic of the ATGCs. In agreement with previous findings, parasitic bacteria, notwithstanding the sometimes dramatic genome shrinkage caused by gene loss, are typically subjected to relatively weak purifying selection, presumably owing to relatively small effective population sizes and frequent bottlenecks. However, no evidence of genome streamlining caused by strong selective pressure was found in any of the ATGCs. On the contrary, a significant positive correlation between the genome size, as well as gene size, and selective pressure was observed, although a variety of free-living prokaryotes with very close selective pressures span nearly the entire range of genome sizes. In addition, we examined the connections between the sequence evolution rate and other genomic features. Although gene order changes much faster than protein sequences during the evolution of prokaryotes, a strong positive correlation was observed between the "rear-rangement distance" and the amino acid distance, suggesting that at least some of the events leading to genome rearrangement are subjected to the same type of selective constraints as the evolution of amino acid sequences.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 73
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [2] Impact of phage on the evolution of bacterial and archaeal genomes
    不详
    ASTROBIOLOGY, 2006, 6 (01) : 103 - 103
  • [3] Distribution and evolution of short tandem repeats in closely related bacterial genomes
    Kassai-Jager, Edit
    Ortutay, Csaba
    Toth, Gabor
    Vellai, Tibor
    Gaspari, Zoltan
    GENE, 2008, 410 (01) : 18 - 25
  • [4] Discovery of novel mechanisms of genome evolution through comparison of closely related genomes
    Kobayashi, Ichizo
    GENES & GENETIC SYSTEMS, 2011, 86 (06) : 405 - 405
  • [5] Elucidation of Operon Structures across Closely Related Bacterial Genomes
    Zhou, Chuan
    Ma, Qin
    Li, Guojun
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (06):
  • [6] Genomic and proteomic comparisons between bacterial and archaeal genomes and related comparisons with the yeast and fly genomes
    Karlin, S
    Brocchieri, L
    Campbell, A
    Cyert, M
    Mrázek, J
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2005, 102 (20) : 7309 - 7314
  • [7] Comprehensive comparison between locations of orthologous genes on archaeal and bacterial genomes
    Horimoto, K
    Fukuchi, S
    Mori, K
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2001, 17 (09) : 791 - 802
  • [8] Evolution of prokaryotic gene order: genome rearrangements in closely related species
    Suyama, M
    Bork, P
    TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2001, 17 (01) : 10 - 13
  • [9] Comparisons of dN/dS are time dependent for closely related bacterial genomes
    Rocha, EPC
    Smith, JM
    Hurst, LD
    Holden, MTG
    Cooper, JE
    Smith, NH
    Feil, EJ
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2006, 239 (02) : 226 - 235
  • [10] Assembly and comparison of two closely related Brassica napus genomes
    Bayer, Philipp E.
    Hurgobin, Bhavna
    Golicz, Agnieszka A.
    Chan, Chon-Kit Kenneth
    Yuan, Yuxuan
    Lee, HueyTyng
    Renton, Michael
    Meng, Jinling
    Li, Ruiyuan
    Long, Yan
    Zou, Jun
    Bancroft, Ian
    Chalhoub, Boulos
    King, Graham J.
    Batley, Jacqueline
    Edwards, David
    PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 15 (12) : 1602 - 1610