Towards a Kantian Phenomenology of Hope

被引:6
作者
Beyleveld, Deryck [1 ,2 ]
Ziche, Paul [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Durham, Durham Law Sch, Durham, England
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Philosophy & Religious Studies, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Kant; Hope; Judgment; Faith; Philosophy of Religion; Epistemology;
D O I
10.1007/s10677-015-9564-x
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to examine the extent to which Kant's Critique of the Power of Judgment (CPoJ) can be, or otherwise ought to be, regarded as a transcendental phenomenology of hope. Kant states repeatedly that CPoJ mediates between the first two Critiques, or between the theoretical knowledge we arrive at on the basis of understanding and reason's foundational role for practical philosophy. In other words, exercising the power of judgment is implicated whenever we try to bring together the ethical issue of strictly determining our actions on the one hand and the necessity to act in the physical world on the other. We will argue that this mediating function is properly understood only if the ideations produced by self-understanding are characterized as objects of rationally required hope or fear.
引用
收藏
页码:927 / 942
页数:16
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PHILOS MIND
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, KANT SYMBOLISCHE ERK
[3]  
Axinn Sidney., 1994, The Logic of Hope: Extensions of Kant's View of Religion
[4]   Korsgaard v. Gewirth on Universalization: Why Gewirthians are Kantians and Kantians Ought to be Gewirthians [J].
Beyleveld, Deryck .
JOURNAL OF MORAL PHILOSOPHY, 2015, 12 (05) :573-597
[5]   Williams' False Dilemma: How to Give Categorically Binding Impartial Reasons to Real Agents [J].
Beyleveld, Deryck .
JOURNAL OF MORAL PHILOSOPHY, 2013, 10 (02) :204-226
[6]  
Breitenbach A, 2009, ANALOGIE VEMUNFT NAT
[7]  
Fichte JG, 1978, GESAMTAUSGABE, VIV, P2
[8]  
Förster E, 2002, Z PHILOS FORSCH, V56, P321
[9]  
Grimm J, 1885, DTSCH WORTERBUCH ENT
[10]  
Guyer Paul., 1996, KANT EXPERIENCE FREE