Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia for Labor

被引:111
作者
Halpern, Stephen H. [1 ]
Carvalho, Brendan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Anesthesia, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesia, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
0.5; MU-G/ML; 0.125-PERCENT BUPIVACAINE; CONTINUOUS-INFUSION; BACKGROUND INFUSION; PLUS SUFENTANIL; PAIN RELIEF; ROPIVACAINE; FENTANYL; BOLUSES; PCEA;
D O I
10.1213/ane.0b013e3181951a7f
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for labor was introduced into clinical practice 20 yr ago. The PCEA technique has been shown to have significant benefits when compared with continuous epidural infusion. We conducted a systematic review using MEDLINE and EMBASE (1988-April 1, 2008) of all randomized, controlled trials in parturients who received PCEA in labor in which one of the following comparisons were made: background infusion versus none; ropivacaine versus bupivacaine; high versus low concentrations of local anesthetics; and new strategies versus standard strategies. The outcomes of interest were maternal analgesia, satisfaction, motor block, and the incidence of unscheduled clinician interventions. A continuous background infusion improved maternal analgesia and reduced unscheduled clinician interventions. Larger bolus doses (more than 5 mL) may provide better analgesia compared with small boluses. Low concentrations of bupivacaine or ropivacaine provide excellent analgesia without significant motor block. Many strategies with PCEA can provide effective labor analgesia. High volume, dilute local anesthetic solutions with a continuous background infusion appear to be the most successful strategy. Research into new delivery strategies, such as mandatory programmed intermittent boluses and computerized feedback dosing, is ongoing.
引用
收藏
页码:921 / 928
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [31] Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labor does not always improve maternal satisfaction
    Nikkola, E
    Läärä, A
    Hinkka, S
    Ekblad, U
    Kero, P
    Salonen, M
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2006, 85 (02) : 188 - 194
  • [32] Ropivacaine 0.075% and bupivacaine 0.075% with fentanyl 2 μg/mL are equivalent for labor epidural analgesia
    Owen, MD
    Thomas, JA
    Smith, T
    Harris, LC
    D'Angelo, R
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 94 (01) : 179 - 183
  • [33] 0.125% ropivacaine is similar to 0.125% bupivacaine for labor analgesia using patient-controlled epidural infusion
    Owen, MD
    D'Angelo, R
    Gerancher, JC
    Thompson, JM
    Foss, ML
    Babb, JD
    Eisenach, JC
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 86 (03) : 527 - 531
  • [34] Paech M J, 1993, Int J Obstet Anesth, V2, P65, DOI 10.1016/0959-289X(93)90081-R
  • [36] Petry J, 2000, Acta Anaesthesiol Belg, V51, P163
  • [37] Fentanyl added to bupivacaine 0.05% or ropivacaine 0.05% in patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour
    Pirbudak, L
    Tuncer, S
    Koçoglu, H
    Göksu, S
    Çelik, Ç
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 19 (04) : 271 - 275
  • [38] Dose-dependent reduction of the minimum local analgesic concentration of bupivacaine by sufentanil for epidural analgesia in labor
    Polley, LS
    Columb, MO
    Wagner, DS
    Naughton, NN
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 89 (03) : 626 - 632
  • [39] Sia A. T., 2006, SMJ Singapore Medical Journal, V47, P951
  • [40] A comparison of a basal infusion with automated mandatory boluses in parturient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor
    Sia, Alex T.
    Lim, Yvonne
    Ocampo, Cecilia
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2007, 104 (03) : 673 - 678