Rigorous synthesis of energy systems by decomposition via time-series aggregation

被引:31
作者
Bahl, Bjorn [1 ]
Luetzow, Julian [1 ]
Shu, David [1 ]
Hollermann, Dinah Elena [1 ]
Lampe, Matthias [1 ]
Hennen, Maike [1 ]
Bardow, Andre [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Tech Thermodynam, D-52056 Aachen, Germany
[2] Forschungszentrum Julich, Inst Energy & Climate Res Energy Syst Engn IEK 10, Wilhelm Johnen Str, D-52425 Julich, Germany
关键词
Optimal design; Synthesis; Energy system; Decomposition; Time-series aggregation; Cluster method; SUPERSTRUCTURE-FREE SYNTHESIS; SUPPLY-SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION; DESIGN; ALGORITHM; OPERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.01.023
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The synthesis of complex energy systems usually involves large time series such that a direct optimization is computationally prohibitive. In this paper, we propose a decomposition method for synthesis problems using time-series aggregation. To initialize the method, the time series is aggregated to one time step. A lower bound is obtained by relaxing the energy balances and underestimating the energy demands leading to a relaxed synthesis problem, which is efficiently solvable. An upper bound is obtained by restricting the original problem with the full time series to an operation problem with a fixed structure obtained from the lower bound solution. If the bounds do not satisfy the specified optimality gap, the resolution of the time-series aggregation is iteratively increased. The decomposition method is applied to two real-world synthesis problems. The results show the fast convergence of the decomposition method outperforming commercial state-of-the-art optimization software. (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 81
页数:12
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [41] A COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR SELECTING VALUES OF INPUT VARIABLES IN THE ANALYSIS OF OUTPUT FROM A COMPUTER CODE
    MCKAY, MD
    BECKMAN, RJ
    CONOVER, WJ
    [J]. TECHNOMETRICS, 1979, 21 (02) : 239 - 245
  • [42] Carpe diem: A novel approach to select representative days for long-term power system modeling
    Nahmmacher, Paul
    Schmid, Eva
    Hirth, Lion
    Knopf, Brigitte
    [J]. ENERGY, 2016, 112 : 430 - 442
  • [43] Energy systems modeling for twenty-first century energy challenges
    Pfenninger, Stefan
    Hawkes, Adam
    Keirstead, James
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 33 : 74 - 86
  • [44] Pistikopoulos E., 2007, Multi-Parametric Programming: Theory, Algorithms and Applications
  • [45] Selecting Representative Days for Capturing the Implications of Integrating Intermittent Renewables in Generation Expansion Planning Problems
    Poncelet, Kris
    Hoschle, Hanspeter
    Delarue, Erik
    Virag, Ana
    D'haeseleer, William
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2017, 32 (03) : 1936 - 1948
  • [46] The Benders decomposition algorithm: A literature review
    Rahmaniani, Ragheb
    Crainic, Teodor Gabriel
    Gendreau, Michel
    Rei, Walter
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 259 (03) : 801 - 817
  • [47] Reklaitis GV, 2000, LATIN AM APPL RES, V30, P285
  • [48] Schutz T., 2016, P ECOS 2016 29 INT C
  • [49] Teichgraeber H., 2017, AM I CHEM ENG ANN M
  • [50] Spatial clustering for district heating integration in urban energy systems: Application to geothermal energy
    Unternaehrer, Jeremy
    Moret, Stefano
    Joostb, Stephane
    Marechal, Francois
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 190 : 749 - 763