Biphasic transthoracic defibrillation causes fewer ECG ST-segmnent changes after shock

被引:49
作者
Reddy, RK [1 ]
Gleva, MJ [1 ]
Gliner, BE [1 ]
Dolack, GL [1 ]
Kudenchuk, PJ [1 ]
Poole, JE [1 ]
Bardy, GH [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV WASHINGTON,DEPT MED,DIV CARDIOL,SEATTLE,WA 98195
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0196-0644(97)70130-6
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: Electrocardiographic abnormalities are common after transthoracic defibrillation. ECG ST-segment changes are especially problematic after defibrillation and may indicate ischemic or shock-induced cardiac dysfunction after resuscitation. Biphasic defibrillation waveforms, compared with monophasic waveforms, diminish shock-induced cardiac dysfunction in laboratory preparations. This effect has not been validated in human subjects. We therefore evaluated in a prospective, blinded fashion the effect of biphasic and monophasic transthoracic defibrillation on the ECG ST segment in 30 consecutive patients during surgery for the implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator. Methods: In each patient two low-energy truncated biphasic transthoracic defibrillation shocks (115 and 130 J) were compared with a standard clinical 200 J monophasic damped-sine wave shock. The biphasic shocks and the damped-sine wave shock have been demonstrated to have equal defibrillation efficacy of 97%. Fifteen-second ECG signals recorded across transthoracic defibrillation electrodes were digitized before ventricular fibrillation induction and immediately after each defibrillation attempt. The ST segments 80 msec after the J point were analyzed in a blinded fashion by two reviewers. The ST-segment deflection, QRS-interval duration, QT interval, and heart rate after each therapy were compared with baseline values. Results: ECG ST-segment elevation was significantly greater with the 200-J damped-sine waveform than with either biphasic waveform. The ECG ST-segment levels were -.55+/-.36 at baseline, .76+/-.36 mm after internal shock, -.02-.36 mm after 115-J biphasic shock, .21+/-.38 mm after 130-J biphasic shock, and 2.09+/-.37 mm after 200-J damped-sine wave shock (P<.0001). QRS-interval duration, QT interval, and heart rate did not change significantly with any waveform. Conclusion: Transthoracic defibrillation with biphasic waveforms results in less postshock ECG evidence of myocardial dysfunction (injury or ischemia) than standard monophasic damped sine waveforms without compromise of defibrillation efficacy.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 134
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] BABBINO MD, 1964, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V190, P93
  • [2] THERAPEUTIC INDEXES FOR TRANSCHEST DEFIBRILLATOR SHOCKS - EFFECTIVE, DAMAGING, AND LETHAL ELECTRICAL DOSES
    BABBS, CF
    TACKER, WA
    VANVLEET, JF
    BOURLAND, JD
    GEDDES, LA
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1980, 99 (06) : 734 - 738
  • [3] TRUNCATED BIPHASIC PULSES FOR TRANSTHORACIC DEFIBRILLATION
    BARDY, GH
    GLINER, BE
    KUDENCHUK, PJ
    POOLE, JE
    DOLACK, GL
    JONES, GK
    ANDERSON, J
    TROUTMAN, C
    JOHNSON, G
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1995, 91 (06) : 1768 - 1774
  • [4] A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF DEFIBRILLATION EFFICACY OF TRUNCATED PULSES AND DAMPED SINE-WAVE PULSES IN HUMANS
    BARDY, GH
    ZAGHI, H
    GARTMAN, D
    POOLE, JE
    KUDENCHUK, PK
    DOLACK, GL
    JOHNSON, G
    TROUTMAN, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 5 (09) : 725 - 730
  • [5] A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED EVALUATION OF BIPHASIC VERSUS MONOPHASIC WAVEFORM PULSES ON DEFIBRILLATION EFFICACY IN HUMANS
    BARDY, GH
    IVEY, TD
    ALLEN, MD
    JOHNSON, G
    MEHRA, R
    GREENE, HL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1989, 14 (03) : 728 - 733
  • [6] DEFIBRILLATION - METHODS AND STRATEGIES - A STATEMENT FOR THE ADVANCED-LIFE-SUPPORT-WORKING-PARTY OF THE EUROPEAN-RESUSCITATION-COUNCIL
    BOSSAERT, L
    KOSTER, R
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 1992, 24 (03) : 211 - 225
  • [7] ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION WITH ELECTIVE DC CARDIOVERSION
    CHUN, PKC
    DAVIA, JE
    DONOHUE, DJ
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1981, 63 (01) : 220 - 224
  • [8] DC PULSE DEFIBRILLATION
    EDMARK, KW
    THOMAS, GI
    JONES, TW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1966, 51 (03) : 326 - &
  • [9] THE SHOCKING STATE OF EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATION
    EISENBERG, MS
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1995, 2 (09) : 761 - 762
  • [10] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIRECT-CURRENT DEFIBRILLATORS
    EWY, GA
    FLETCHER, RD
    EWY, MD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 1972, 5 (04) : 349 - 354