Advances in restoration ecology: rising to the challenges of the coming decades

被引:390
作者
Perring, Michael P. [1 ,2 ]
Standish, Rachel J. [1 ,3 ]
Price, Jodi N. [1 ]
Craig, Michael D. [1 ,3 ]
Erickson, Todd E. [1 ,4 ]
Ruthrof, Katinka X. [3 ]
Whiteley, Andrew S. [5 ]
Valentine, Leonie E. [1 ]
Hobbs, Richard J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Plant Biol, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[2] Univ Ghent, Forest & Nat Lab, BE-9090 Gontrode Melle, Belgium
[3] Murdoch Univ, Sch Vet & Life Sci, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
[4] Kings Pk & Bot Gardens, Kings Pk, WA 6005, Australia
[5] Univ Western Australia, Sch Earth & Environm, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Anthropocene; community assembly; ecosystem function; ecosystem services; ESA Centennial Paper; faunal restoration; global change; landscape scale; novel ecosystems; resilience; socio-ecological systems; traits; trophic networks; MULTIPLE ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; PLANT-SOIL FEEDBACK; MYCORRHIZAL NETWORKS; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; HABITAT RESTORATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; AGRICULTURAL LAND; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; GLOBAL CHANGE;
D O I
10.1890/ES15-00121.1
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Simultaneous environmental changes challenge biodiversity persistence and human wellbeing. The science and practice of restoration ecology, in collaboration with other disciplines, can contribute to overcoming these challenges. This endeavor requires a solid conceptual foundation based in empirical research which confronts, tests and influences theoretical developments. We review conceptual developments in restoration ecology over the last 30 years. We frame our review in the context of changing restoration goals which reflect increased societal awareness of the scale of environmental degradation and the recognition that inter-disciplinary approaches are needed to tackle environmental problems. Restoration ecology now encompasses facilitative interactions and network dynamics, trophic cascades, and above- and below ground linkages. It operates in a non-equilibrium, alternative states framework, at the landscape scale, and in response to changing environmental, economic and social conditions. Progress has been marked by conceptual advances in the fields of trait-environment relationships, community assembly, and understanding the links between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Conceptual and practical advances have been enhanced by applying evolving technologies, including treatments to increase seed germination and overcome recruitment bottlenecks, high throughput DNA sequencing to elucidate soil community structure and function, and advances in satellite technology and GPS tracking to monitor habitat use. The synthesis of these technologies with systematic reviews of context dependencies in restoration success, model based analyses and consideration of complex socio-ecological systems will allow generalizations to inform evidence based interventions. Ongoing challenges include setting realistic, socially acceptable goals for restoration under changing environmental conditions, and prioritizing actions in an increasingly space-competitive world. Ethical questions also surround the use of genetically modified material, translocations, taxon substitutions, and de-extinction, in restoration ecology. Addressing these issues, as the Ecological Society of America looks to its next century, will require current and future generations of researchers and practitioners, including economists, engineers, philosophers, landscape architects, social scientists and restoration ecologists, to work together with communities and governments to rise to the environmental challenges of the coming decades.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 244 条
[1]  
Albert Steven, 2000, Ecological Restoration North America, V18, P87
[2]   On underestimation of global vulnerability to tree mortality and forest die-off from hotter drought in the Anthropocene [J].
Allen, Craig D. ;
Breshears, David D. ;
McDowell, Nate G. .
ECOSPHERE, 2015, 6 (08)
[3]   Phylogenetic conservatism in plant-soil feedback and its implications for plant abundance [J].
Anacker, Brian L. ;
Klironomos, John N. ;
Maherali, Hafiz ;
Reinhart, Kurt O. ;
Strauss, Sharon Y. .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2014, 17 (12) :1613-1621
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1979, PLANT STRATEGIES VEG
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, GLOBAL CHANGE EARTH, DOI [DOI 10.1007/B137870, 10.1007/b137870]
[6]  
[Anonymous], PLANT GERMPLASM CONS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2004, The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration
[8]   Are Socioeconomic Benefits of Restoration Adequately Quantified? A Meta-analysis of Recent Papers (2000-2008) in Restoration Ecology and 12 Other Scientific Journals [J].
Aronson, James ;
Blignaut, James N. ;
Milton, Suzanne J. ;
Le Maitre, David ;
Esler, Karen J. ;
Limouzin, Amandine ;
Fontaine, Christelle ;
de Wit, Martin P. ;
Mugido, Worship ;
Prinsloo, Philip ;
van der Elst, Leandri ;
Lederer, Ned .
RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2010, 18 (02) :143-154
[9]   Low recruitment across life stages partly accounts for the slow colonization of forest herbs [J].
Baeten, Lander ;
Jacquemyn, Hans ;
Van Calster, Hans ;
Van Beek, Eric ;
Devlaeminck, Rebecca ;
Verheyen, Kris ;
Hermy, Martin .
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2009, 97 (01) :109-117
[10]   Linking Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Current Uncertainties and the Necessary Next Steps [J].
Balvanera, Patricia ;
Siddique, Ilyas ;
Dee, Laura ;
Paquette, Alain ;
Isbell, Forest ;
Gonzalez, Andrew ;
Byrnes, Jarrett ;
O'Connor, Mary I. ;
Hungate, Bruce A. ;
Griffin, John N. .
BIOSCIENCE, 2014, 64 (01) :49-57