Comparison of a single approach versus double approaches for the treatment of terrible traid of elbow-A retrospective study

被引:9
作者
Zhou, Chengwei
Xu, Jianxiang
Lin, Jinti
Lin, Renjin
Chen, Kai
Kong, Jianzhong
Feng, Yongzeng [1 ]
Shui, Xiaolong [1 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Med Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Affiliated Hosp 2, 109 Xue Yuan West Rd, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Terrible traid of the elbow; Extensor digitorum communis; Approach; Function recovery; Complication rate; Ulnar nerve; CORONOID PROCESS; RADIAL HEAD; TRIAD; FRACTURES; DISLOCATION; PROTOCOL; INJURY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.012
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Dislocation of the elbow associated with radial head and coronoid fracture, the so-called "terrible triad" of the elbow, is challenging to treat and has a history of complicated outcomes. This study is to compare the clinical outcome of a single lateral approach-the extensile splitting extensor digitorum communis (EDC) approach and combined lateral and medial (CML) approaches for the treatment of terrible traid of the elbow (TTE). Material and methods: After appropriate exclusion, 60 TTE patients (28 patients in the EDC group, 32 patients in the CML group) from 2009 January to 2015 August were reviewed in this study. All included patients underwent open reduction, lateral collateral ligament complex repair, and postoperative function exercise. Surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, elbow motion, MEPS score and complication rate were recorded and compared. Result: There were significant differences in surgery time (P < 0.05) and ulnar nerve lesion symptom, no patient suffered ulnar nerve lesion symptom in EDC group, but 5 patients in CML group suffered it. No differences were found in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain and heterotopic ossification (P > 0.05). Mean follow-up was 26.1 months (from 24 to 30 months), at the final follow-up, 2 patients in EDC group and 4 patients in CML group required elbow release operation, mean flexion and extension (124.1 +/- 14.6 degrees and 8.3 +/- 5.3 degrees), pronation and supination (73.4 +/- 5.3 degrees and 74.4 +/- 6.0 degrees) in EDC group were higher than CML group (114.2 +/- 15.0 degrees and 17.6 +/- 8.0 degrees, 69.2 +/- 6.9 degrees and 70.4 +/- 7.5 degrees, P < 0.05). Besides, MEPS score in the former group was also higher than the latter group (91.8 +/- 4.5 to 84.4 +/- 5.2, P < 0.01). Conclusion: The single lateral approach achieved better function recovery than combined lateral and medial approach, decreasing the risk of ulnar nerve lesion and surgery time for the treatment of TTE.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 55
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Evaluation of a combined posterior lateral and anteromedial approach in the treatment of terrible triad of the elbow A retrospective study
    Chen, Hong-Wei
    Wang, Zi-Yang
    Wu, Xulin
    Tang, Bensen
    Zhu, Weimin
    Zhou, Guangfu
    Liu, Fuyao
    Qiu, Bing
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (22)
  • [2] Treatment of the terrible triad of the elbow by olecranon osteotomy: a retrospective cohort study
    Zhou, Ming
    Xue, Yuan
    Jia, Xueyuan
    Wang, Jianbing
    Wu, Yongwei
    Ma, Yunhong
    Sun, Zhenzhong
    Rui, Yongjun
    PEERJ, 2024, 12
  • [3] Comparison of acute versus subacute treatment of terrible triad injuries of the elbow
    Lindenhovius, Anneluuk L. C.
    Jupiter, Jesse B.
    Ring, David
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 33A (06): : 920 - 926
  • [4] Comparison of Single versus Double Nerve Transfers for Elbow Flexion after Brachial Plexus Injury
    Carlsen, Brian T.
    Kircher, Michelle F.
    Spinner, Robert J.
    Bishop, Allen T.
    Shin, Alexander Y.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 127 (01) : 269 - 276
  • [5] Single versus double flap approach in periodontal regenerative treatment
    Schincaglia, Gian Pietro
    Hebert, Eric
    Farina, Roberto
    Simonelli, Anna
    Trombelli, Leonardo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2015, 42 (06) : 557 - 566
  • [6] A single-center retrospective comparison of muscle versus cutaneous free flaps for posterior elbow defect reconstruction
    Falkner, Florian
    Bigdeli, Amir Khosrow
    Thomas, Benjamin
    Panayi, Adriana
    Mayer, Simon
    Vollbach, Felix
    Kneser, Ulrich
    Gazyakan, Emre
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2024, 97 : 287 - 295
  • [7] Comparison of different treatment approaches for coronoid process fracture in terrible triad injury: a multicenter, randomized controlled study
    Lu, Shengdi
    Wang, Yanmao
    Rui, Biyu
    Ding, Jian
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 47 (08) : 2103 - 2111
  • [8] Suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approaches in the treatment of tibia intramedullary nailing: a retrospective cohort study
    Cui, Yiliang
    Hua, Xingyi
    Schmidutz, Florian
    Zhou, Jian
    Yin, Zongsheng
    Yan, Shuang G.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [9] Multicenter retrospective study of noncompressible torso hemorrhage: Anatomic locations of bleeding and comparison of endovascular versus open approach
    Chang, Ronald
    Fox, Erin E.
    Greene, Thomas J.
    Eastridge, Brian J.
    Gilani, Ramyar
    Chung, Kevin K.
    DeSantis, Stacia M.
    DuBose, Joseph J.
    Tomasek, Jeffrey S.
    Fortuna, Gerald R., Jr.
    Sams, Valerie G.
    Todd, S. Rob
    Podbielski, Jeanette M.
    Wade, Charles E.
    Holcomb, John B.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2017, 83 (01) : 11 - 18
  • [10] Single versus double insemination: a retrospective audit of pregnancy rates with two treatment protocols in donor insemination
    Deary, AJ
    Seaton, JEV
    Prentice, A
    Morton, NC
    Booth, AK
    Smith, SK
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1997, 12 (07) : 1494 - 1496