Protein crystallization:: universal thermodynamic vs. specific effects of PEG

被引:7
|
作者
Pullara, F. [1 ]
Emanuele, A. [1 ]
Palma-Vittorelli, M. B.
Palma, M. U.
机构
[1] Univ Palermo, Dept Phys & Astron Sci, I-90123 Palermo, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1039/b717404g
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The interest of nucleation of protein crystals and aggregates (including oligomerization) spans from basic physics theory all the way to biophysics, nanophysics, clinical sciences, biotechnologies, food technologies and polymer solvent interactions. Understanding nucleation within a theoretical framework capable of providing quantitative predictions and control of nucleation rates, or even the very occurrence of crystallization, is a long-sought goal of remarkable relevance to each of the above fields. A large amount of work has been aimed at such goal, but success has been so far rather limited. Work at our laboratory has more recently highlighted a direct link between nucleation rates and the universal scaling properties of concentration fluctuations occurring in the vicinity of a phase transition. The phase transition here concerned is that of non nucleated liquid-liquid demixing of the solution. This novel universality feature allows viewing nucleation processes within one and the same frame, and to capture all normalized nucleation rates on one and the same "master curve'' for different proteins, as a function of one parameter only. The quantitative value of the latter is the result of the joint, non additive effects of protein composition, conformation and state (e. g. oligomers), as well as of the temperature of non nucleated liquid-liquid demixing of the solution at the given protein concentration and at the given conditions of the solution. The present work was undertaken for the purpose of ascertaining if (and if so, in what way) the universality feature can allow the quantitative prediction of nucleation rates changes caused by the addition to the solvent of additives empirically known for their strong effect on such rates, as well as the very occurrence of crystallization. To this purpose we have used PEG (polyethylene glycol), which is perhaps the most familiar and most-used additive, and have measured by static and dynamic light scattering the properties of concentration fluctuation of the system as a function of temperature, for various PEG concentration and polymerisation degrees. Experiments have shown that the action of PEG can in no way be accounted for in terms of changes of specific local contacts or of a one-to-one chaperone-like action. Instead, the effect of PEG is seen to be due to alteration of the thermodynamic properties of the solution. This leaves unchanged the universality features and consequently also the validity and predictive power of the master curve in the various conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 308
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Thermodynamic vs. Kinetic Basis for Polymorph Selection
    Hodnett, Benjamin K.
    Verma, Vivek
    PROCESSES, 2019, 7 (05)
  • [22] What are the specific vs. generalized effects of drugs of abuse on neuropsychological performance?
    Fernandez-Serrano, Maria Jose
    Perez-Garcia, Miguel
    Verdejo-Garcia, Antonio
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2011, 35 (03): : 377 - 406
  • [23] Predicting metal toxicity revisited: general properties vs. specific effects
    Wolterbeek, HT
    Verburg, TG
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 279 (1-3) : 87 - 115
  • [24] Evaluation of Small Bowel Images According to the Preparation Method for Capsule Endoscopy: NPO vs. PEG 2L vs. PEG 4L
    Park, Sung Chul
    Kim, Eun Sun
    Jung, Eun Suk
    Lee, Sehe Dong
    Jang, Jin Su
    Kwon, Yong Dae
    Park, Sanghoon
    Keum, Bora
    Seo, Yeon Seok
    Jeen, Yoon Tae
    Chun, Hoon Jai
    Um, Soon Ho
    Kim, Chang Duck
    Ryu, Ho Sang
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (05) : AB188 - AB189
  • [25] ACTIVATED CHARCOAL VS. UNIVERSAL ANTIDOTE AS AN ANTIDOTE FOR POISONS
    PICCHIONI, AL
    CHIN, L
    VERHULST, HL
    DIETERLE, B
    TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, 1966, 8 (03) : 447 - +
  • [26] Staleness vs. waiting time in universal discrete broadcast
    Langberg, M
    Sprintson, A
    Bruck, J
    2005 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT), Vols 1 and 2, 2005, : 2124 - 2128
  • [27] Universal device programmers and the ASIC vs. FPGA dilemma
    Hinz, M
    ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, 1997, 69 (851): : 64 - &
  • [28] Universal vs. particular reasoning: a study with neuroimaging techniques
    Abrusci, V. Michele
    Casadio, Claudia
    Medaglia, M. Teresa
    Porcaro, Camillo
    LOGIC JOURNAL OF THE IGPL, 2013, 21 (06) : 1017 - 1027
  • [29] Universal vs. selective screening for thyroid dysfunction in pregnancy
    Dieguez Felechosa, M.
    Sanchez Ragnarsson, C.
    Riestra Fernandez, M.
    Suarez Gil, P.
    Delgado Alvarez, E.
    Menendez Torre, E.
    CLINICA E INVESTIGACION EN GINECOLOGIA Y OBSTETRICIA, 2019, 46 (01): : 9 - 14
  • [30] Evaluation of small bowel images according to the preparation method for capsule endoscopy: NPO vs. PEG 2L vs. PEG 4L
    Choi, H. S.
    Cho, H. J.
    Lee, K. G.
    Kim, J.
    Hyun, J. J.
    Park, S. C.
    Kim, E. S.
    Park, S.
    Keum, B.
    Seo, Y. S.
    Kim, Y. S.
    Jeen, Y. T.
    Chun, H. J.
    Um, S. H.
    Kim, C. D.
    Ryu, H. S.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 24 : A94 - A94