A state-of the-art survey & testbed of fuzzy AHP (FAHP) applications

被引:319
作者
Kubler, Sylvain [1 ]
Robert, Jeremy [1 ]
Derigent, William [2 ,3 ]
Voisin, Alexandre [2 ,3 ]
Le Traon, Yves [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Luxembourg, Interdisciplinary Ctr Secur Reliabil & Trust, 4 Rue Alphonse Weicker, L-2721 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
[2] Univ Lorraine, CRAN, UMR 7039, 2 Ave Foret de Haye, F-54516 Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
[3] CNRS, CRAN, UMR 7039, F-75700 Paris, France
关键词
Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process; Fuzzy AHP (FAHP); Multiple criteria decision-making; Decision analysis; Decision support systems; TOPSIS; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; MACHINE-TOOL SELECTION; EXTENT ANALYSIS METHOD; SUPPLIER SELECTION; SAFETY EVALUATION; SERVICE QUALITY; SUPPORT-SYSTEM; MCDM APPROACH; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2016.08.064
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
As a practical popular methodology for dealing with fuzziness and uncertainty in Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM), Fuzzy AHP (FAHP) has been applied to a wide range of applications. As of the time of writing there is no state of the art survey of FAHP, we carry out a literature review of 190 application papers (i.e., applied research papers), published between 2004 and 2016, by classifying them on the basis of the area of application, the identified theme, the year of publication, and so forth. The identified themes and application areas have been chosen based upon the latest state-of-the-art survey of AHP conducted by [Vaidya, O., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of operational research, 169(1), 1-29.]. To help readers extract quick and meaningful information, the reviewed papers are summarized in various tabular formats and charts. Unlike previous literature surveys, results and findings are made available through an online (and free) testbed, which can serve as a ready reference for those who wish to apply, modify or extend FAHP in various applications areas. This online testbed makes also available one or more fuzzy pairwise comparison matrices (FPCMs) from all the reviewed papers (255 matrices in total). In terms of results and findings, this survey shows that: (i) FAHP is used primarily in the Manufacturing, Industry and Government sectors; (ii) Asia is the torchbearer in this field, where FAHP is mostly applied in the theme areas of Selection and Evaluation; (iii) a significant amount of research papers (43% of the reviewed literature) combine FAHP with other tools, particularly with TOPSIS, QFD and ANP (AHP's variant); (iv) Chang's extent analysis method, which is used for FPCMs' weight derivation in FAHP, is still the most popular method in spite of a number of criticisms in recent years (considered in 57% of the reviewed literature). (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 422
页数:25
相关论文
共 232 条
[61]   Biogas as a sustainable energy source in China: Regional development strategy application and decision making [J].
Deng, Yanfei ;
Xu, Jiuping ;
Liu, Ying ;
Mancl, Karen .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 35 :294-303
[62]   The role of fuzzy sets in decision sciences: Old techniques and new directions [J].
Dubois, Didier .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2011, 184 (01) :3-28
[63]   Computer-aided machine-tool selection based on a Fuzzy-AHP approach [J].
Duran, Orlando ;
Aguilo, Jose .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2008, 34 (03) :1787-1794
[64]   Computer-aided maintenance management systems selection based on a fuzzy AHP approach [J].
Duran, Orlando .
ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2011, 42 (10) :821-829
[65]   Regime switching fuzzy AHP model for choice-varying priorities problem and expert consistency prioritization: A cubic fuzzy-priority matrix design [J].
Duru, Okan ;
Bulut, Emrah ;
Yoshida, Shigeru .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (05) :4954-4964
[66]   An integrated fuzzy multi criteria group decision making approach for ERP system selection [J].
Efe, Burak .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2016, 38 :106-117
[67]  
Enea M., 2004, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, V3, P39, DOI [DOI 10.1023/B:FODM.0000013071.63614.3d, 10.1023/B:FODM.0000013071.63614.3d]
[68]   EVALUATION OF RENEWABLE ENERGY ALTERNATIVES USING MACBETH AND FUZZY AHP MULTICRITERIA METHODS: THE CASE OF TURKEY [J].
Ertay, Tijen ;
Kahraman, Cengiz ;
Kaya, Ihsan .
TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2013, 19 (01) :38-62
[69]   Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods [J].
Ertugrul, Irfan ;
Karakasoglu, Nilsen .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (01) :702-715
[70]   MAINTENANCE STRATEGY SELECTION USING AHP AND COPRAS UNDER FUZZY ENVIRONMENT [J].
Fouladgar, Mohammad Majid ;
Yazdani-Chamzini, Abdolreza ;
Lashgari, Ali ;
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras ;
Turskis, Zenonas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, 2012, 16 (01) :85-104