Age differences in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning and extinction in rats

被引:18
|
作者
Meyer, Heidi C. [1 ]
Bucci, David J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Coll, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
关键词
Adolescence; Learning; Reinforcement; Appetitive; Pavlovian; RISK-TAKING BEHAVIOR; TEENAGE BRAIN SENSITIVITY; MEDIAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; NUCLEUS-ACCUMBENS-SEPTI; ADOLESCENT BRAIN; ADULT RATS; PLACE PREFERENCE; PARTIAL-REINFORCEMENT; COGNITIVE CONTROL; FEMALE RATS;
D O I
10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.10.004
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Mounting evidence indicates that adolescents exhibit heightened sensitivity to rewards and reward-related cues compared to adults, and that adolescents are often unable to exert behavioral control in the face of such cues. Moreover, differences in reward processing during adolescence have been linked to heightened risk taking and impulsivity. However, little is known about the processes by which adolescents learn about the appetitive properties of environmental stimuli that signal reward. To address this, Pavlovian conditioning procedures were used to test for differences in excitatory conditioning between adult and adolescent rats using various schedules of reinforcement. Specifically, separate cohorts of adult and adolescent rats were trained under conditions of consistent (continuous) or intermittent (partial) reinforcement. We found that the acquisition of anticipatory responding to a continuously-reinforced cue proceeded similarly in adolescents and adults. In contrast, responding increased at a greater rate in adolescents compared to adults during presentations of a partially-reinforced cue. We subsequently compared the ability of adolescent and adult rats to dynamically adjust the representation of a reward-predictive cue during extinction trials, in which a secondary inhibitory representation is acquired for the previously-reinforced stimulus. We observed significant age differences in the ability to flexibly update cue representations during extinction, in that the appetitive properties of cues with a history of either continuous or partial reinforcement persisted to a greater extent in adolescents relative to adults. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 362
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Enhanced Pavlovian conditioning with a change in appetitive reinforcer
    John M. Pearce
    Edward S. Redhead
    Animal Learning & Behavior, 1999, 27 : 369 - 378
  • [22] Pavlovian appetitive discriminative conditioning in Aplysia californica
    Colwill, RM
    Goodrum, K
    Martin, A
    ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 1997, 25 (03): : 268 - 276
  • [23] METHOTREXATE DOES NOT INTERFERE WITH AN APPETITIVE PAVLOVIAN CONDITIONING TASK IN SPRAGUE-DAWLEY RATS
    STOCK, HS
    ROSELLINI, RA
    ABRAHAMSEN, GC
    MCCAFFREY, RJ
    RUCKDESCHEL, JC
    PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1995, 58 (05) : 969 - 973
  • [24] OUTCOME-SELECTIVE EFFECTS OF INTERTRIAL REINFORCEMENT IN A PAVLOVIAN APPETITIVE CONDITIONING PARADIGM WITH RATS
    DELAMATER, AR
    ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 1995, 23 (01): : 31 - 39
  • [25] Secondary extinction in Pavlovian fear conditioning
    Vurbic, Drina
    Bouton, Mark E.
    LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 2011, 39 (03) : 202 - 211
  • [26] Secondary extinction in Pavlovian fear conditioning
    Drina Vurbic
    Mark E. Bouton
    Learning & Behavior, 2011, 39 : 202 - 211
  • [27] Reacquisition following extinction in appetitive conditioning
    Ricker, ST
    Bouton, ME
    ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 1996, 24 (04): : 423 - 436
  • [28] Appetitive-Aversive Interactions in Pavlovian Fear Conditioning
    Nasser, Helen M.
    McNally, Gavan P.
    BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 126 (03) : 404 - 422
  • [29] Analysis of the learned irrelevance effect in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning
    Bonardi, C
    Hall, G
    Ong, SY
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION B-COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 58 (02): : 141 - 162
  • [30] Mechanisms of attention for appetitive and aversive outcomes in Pavlovian conditioning
    Austin, A. J.
    Duka, T.
    BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2010, 213 (01) : 19 - 26