Effects of Switching Acute Treatment on Disability in Migraine Patients Using Triptans

被引:19
|
作者
Serrano, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Buse, Dawn C. [2 ,3 ]
Kori, Shashi H. [4 ]
Papapetropoulos, Sypridon [5 ,6 ]
Cunanan, Cedric M. [7 ]
Manack, Aubrey N. [7 ]
Reed, Michael L. [1 ]
Lipton, Richard B. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vedanta Res, Chapel Hill, NC 27517 USA
[2] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[3] Montefiore Headache Ctr, Bronx, NY USA
[4] MAP Pharmaceut, Mountain View, CA USA
[5] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[6] Pfizer, Cambridge, MA USA
[7] Allergan Pharmaceut Inc, Irvine, CA USA
来源
HEADACHE | 2013年 / 53卷 / 09期
关键词
migraine; headache-related disability; acute treatment; triptan; opioid; barbiturate; EPISODIC MIGRAINE; AMERICAN MIGRAINE; ORAL SUMATRIPTAN; POOR RESPONSE; DOUBLE-BLIND; HEADACHE; ELETRIPTAN; TOPIRAMATE; MANAGEMENT; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1111/head.12164
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectiveTo assess the influence of switching acute treatment on headache-related disability in a population sample of individuals with migraine using acute triptan therapy. BackgroundAcute treatments for migraine are often modified in clinical practice. The effect of changes in treatment from one triptan to another or from a triptan to another medication class has rarely been studied. MethodsPatterns of acute treatment for migraine were monitored from 1 year to the next in the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) Study for the following couplets (2005-2006, 2006-2007, 2007-2008, and 2008-2009). Changes in medication regimens were classified as follows: (1) switch within the triptan class; (2) switch to combination analgesics containing opioids or barbiturates; (3) switch to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) agents; (4) maintaining current therapy (consistent use, control). We assessed change in migraine disability assessment scale score from the first to the second year of a couplet contrasting those with consistent use with those who changed acute treatment. Each individual contributed only 1 couplet to the analysis. Persons who added an acute treatment are considered in a separate manuscript. We modeled change in migraine disability assessment scale score as a function of change in medication regimen with consistent users as the control group. ResultsWe identified 81 individuals who switched to another triptan, with a referent of 619 who remained consistent, 31 cases who switched to an opioid or barbiturate with a referent of 666 who remained consistent, and 20 cases who switched to an NSAID with a referent of 667 cases who remained consistent. In cell-mean coded analyses of covariance (ANCOVA), switching from one triptan to another or switching from a triptan to an opioid/barbiturate was never associated with significant improvements in headache-related disability compared with consistent treatment. Switching from a triptan to an NSAID was associated with significant increases in headache-related disability among those with high-frequency episodic/chronic migraine (HFEM/CM) compared with those with low-frequency episodic migraine (LFEM) (interaction=34.81, 95% confidence interval 10.61 to 59.00). The same was true comparing high-frequency episodic/chronic migraine with those with moderate-frequency episodic migraine (interaction=48.73, 95% confidence interval 2.63 to 94.83). ConclusionsIn this observational study, switching triptan regimens does not appear to be associated with improvements in headache-related disability and in some cases is associated with increased headache-related disability.
引用
收藏
页码:1415 / 1429
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Lasmiditan for Patients with Migraine and Contraindications to Triptans: A Post Hoc Analysis
    John H. Krege
    Richard B. Lipton
    Simin K. Baygani
    Mika Komori
    Sinéad M. Ryan
    Maurice Vincent
    Pain and Therapy, 2022, 11 : 701 - 712
  • [32] Barriers to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Migraine: Effects of Sex, Income, and Headache Features
    Lipton, Richard B.
    Serrano, Daniel
    Holland, Starr
    Fanning, Kristina M.
    Reed, Michael L.
    Buse, Dawn C.
    HEADACHE, 2013, 53 (01): : 81 - 92
  • [33] Pharmacological treatment of migraine: CGRP and 5-HT beyond the triptans
    de Vries, Tessa
    Villalon, Carlos M.
    MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette
    PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 211
  • [34] The Acute Treatment of Migraine in Adults: The American Headache Society Evidence Assessment of Migraine Pharmacotherapies
    Marmura, Michael J.
    Silberstein, Stephen D.
    Schwedt, Todd J.
    HEADACHE, 2015, 55 (01): : 3 - 20
  • [35] Triptans for Acute Migraine: Drug Class Review to Help Inform Policy Decisions
    Knowles, Sandra
    Oh, Paul
    Gomes, Tara
    HEADACHE, 2015, 55 : 191 - 198
  • [36] Patients' preference for triptans and other medications as a tool for assessing the efficacy of acute treatments for migraine
    Dowson A.J.
    Tepper S.J.
    Dahlöf C.
    The Journal of Headache and Pain, 2005, 6 (3) : 112 - 120
  • [37] Persistence and switching patterns of oral migraine prophylactic medications among patients with chronic migraine: A retrospective claims analysis
    Hepp, Zsolt
    Dodick, David W.
    Varon, Sepideh F.
    Chia, Jenny
    Matthew, Nitya
    Gillard, Patrick
    Hansen, Ryan N.
    Devine, Emily Beth
    CEPHALALGIA, 2017, 37 (05) : 470 - 485
  • [38] Triptans in the treatment of basilar migraine and migraine with prolonged aura
    Klapper, J
    Mathew, N
    Nett, R
    HEADACHE, 2001, 41 (10): : 981 - 984
  • [39] Comparison of triptans, NSAID and combination in migraine attack treatment
    Duman, Taskin
    Dede, Hava Ozlem
    Seydaoglu, Gulsah
    AGRI-THE JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF ALGOLOGY, 2016, 28 (03): : 143 - 149
  • [40] Nerivio® remote electrical neuromodulation for acute treatment of chronic migraine
    Nierenburg, Hida
    Stark-Inbar, Alit
    PAIN MANAGEMENT, 2021,