Prognostic value of the 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer patients with surgical risk factors

被引:45
作者
Yan, Ding-Ding [1 ]
Tang, Qiu [1 ]
Chen, Jian-Hong [1 ]
Tu, Ye-Qiang [1 ]
Lv, Xiao-Juan [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Canc Hosp, Dept Gynecol Oncol, 38 Guangji Rd, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH | 2019年 / 11卷
关键词
cervical cancer; 5-year overall survival; 5-year progression-free survival; FIGO staging system; LYMPH-NODE METASTASIS; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; CARCINOMA; IB; IIA; LYMPHADENECTOMY; SURVIVAL; NUMBER;
D O I
10.2147/CMAR.S203059
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the predictive value of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for cervical cancer patients with surgical risk factors. Methods: Data of 662 cervical cancer patients (stages IB and IIA) with surgical risk factors treated at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between 2008 and 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate log-rank test and multivariate Cox regression models were adopted to evaluate the relationship between 2018 FIGO stage and survival. Results: On re-staging of patients, 17.3%, 44.5%, 25.4%, and 37.1% of the patients with FIGO 2009 stage IB1, 1B2, IIA1, and IIA2, respectively, were upgraded to FIGO 2018 IIIC1P stage, and 2.1%, 3.0%, 3.1%, and 2.1% patients, respectively, were upgraded to IIIC2P stage. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of patients with FIGO 2018 stage IB1, IB2, IB3, IIA1, IIA2, IIIC1P, and IIIC2P were 95.3%, 95.1%, 90.4%, 92.4%, 86.4%, 81.9%, and 56.3%, respectively. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 94.0%, 91.0%, 88.5%, 91.4%, 86.4%, 79.5%, and 43.8%, respectively. The 5-year OS rates of patients with 1-2 positive pelvic lymph nodes (PLNs) and those with >2 positive PLNs were 86.0% and 73.7%, respectively, and the 5-year PFS rates were 84.2% and 70.2%, respectively. OS and PFS of patients with 1-2 positive PLNs in stage IIIC1P were similar to those of patients in stage IIA2 without lymph node metastasis, but significantly better than those of patients with >2 positive PLNs. Multivariate analysis showed FIGO 2018 stage to be an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS. Conclusion: The 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer appears to be useful for predicting prognosis of patients with risk factors after radical surgery. Survival of stage IIA1 patients is better than that of stage IB3 patients. Stage IIIC1 is not homogenous; survival in stage IIIC1P depends on the number of positive PLNs.
引用
收藏
页码:5473 / 5480
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] SURVIVAL AND PATTERNS OF RECURRENCE IN CERVICAL-CANCER METASTATIC TO PERIAORTIC LYMPH-NODES - (A GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP-STUDY)
    BERMAN, ML
    KEYS, H
    CREASMAN, W
    DISAIA, P
    BUNDY, B
    BLESSING, J
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1984, 19 (01) : 8 - 16
  • [2] Cancer of the cervix uteri
    Bhatla, Neerja
    Aoki, Daisuke
    Sharma, Daya Nand
    Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2018, 143 : 22 - 36
  • [3] Pre-treatment surgical para-aortic lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer
    Brockbank, Elly
    Kokka, Fani
    Bryant, Andrew
    Pomel, Christophe
    Reynolds, Karina
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (03):
  • [4] Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating the Survival of Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Undergoing Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy Before Chemoradiotherapy in the Era of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging
    Gouy, Sebastien
    Morice, Philippe
    Narducci, Fabrice
    Uzan, Catherine
    Martinez, Alejandra
    Rey, Annie
    Bentivegna, Enrica
    Pautier, Patricia
    Deandreis, Desiree
    Querleu, Denis
    Haie-Meder, Christine
    Leblanc, Eric
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (24) : 3026 - U73
  • [5] Long-term follow-up of RTOG 92-10: Cervical cancer with positive para-aortic lymph nodes
    Grigsby, PW
    Heydon, K
    Mutch, DG
    Kim, RY
    Eifel, P
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (04): : 982 - 987
  • [6] INOUE T, 1990, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V65, P1923, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19900501)65:9<1923::AID-CNCR2820650909>3.0.CO
  • [7] 2-M
  • [8] INOUE T, 1984, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V54, P1714, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19841015)54:8<1714::AID-CNCR2820540838>3.0.CO
  • [9] 2-S
  • [10] International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system revised: what should be considered critically for gynecologic cancer?
    Kim, Hee Seung
    Song, Yong Sang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 30 (03) : 135 - 136