Modern role of sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse surgery-A systemic review

被引:47
|
作者
Tseng, Ling-Hong [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Ilene [3 ]
Chang, Shuenn-Dyh [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Chyi-Long [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Lin Kou Branch, Tao Yuan, Taiwan
[2] Univ Chang Gung, Sch Med, Tao Yuan, Taiwan
[3] Genom Prote & Bioinformat Pty Ltd, Ctr Bioinformat & Syst Biol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY | 2013年 / 52卷 / 03期
关键词
pelvic organ prolapse; pelvic reconstruction surgery; sacrospinous ligament fixation; systemic review; SUPPORT DEFECTS; SEXUAL FUNCTION; VAULT PROLAPSE; SUSPENSION; COLPOPEXY; WOMEN; MANAGEMENT; QUALITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; INCONTINENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.tjog.2012.11.002
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition in women. Women with POP often experience pelvic discomfort, urinary and fecal problems, sexual dysfunction, and an overall decrease in their quality of life. Surgical treatment is a feasible option if conservative management fails. Various surgical techniques have been proposed to correct POP with or without the use of graft material. Owing to recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration warnings about mesh-related complications, sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSF), as a traditional vaginal procedure, may play an important role again. To answer this question and evaluate quantitatively the efficacy of SSF in POP, we conducted a systemic review of the available data about SSF and POP. Interventions had to include SSF as a point of attachment. To eliminate confounding bias and effect modification, at least one arm must include SSF without mesh or graft. All follow-up periods were allowed. Information on the following parameters was extracted and entered into a database: study design, type of intervention, number of patients, follow-up in months, cure rate, recurrence rate, intra/postoperative complications, and/or uni/bilateral, preventive/therapeutic, or concomitant procedures. Published papers from the years 1995 to 2011 were selected for analysis. Copyright (C) 2013, Taiwan Association of Obstetrics & Gynecology. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 317
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Surgery for pelvic organ prolapse
    Patel, Devin N.
    Anger, Jennifer T.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2016, 26 (04) : 302 - 308
  • [22] Long-Term Outcome of Anterior-Apical Mesh (Surelift) Versus Anterior Colporrhaphy and Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
    Lo, Tsia-Shu
    Rellora, Louiza Erika
    Rom, Eyal
    Chiung, Huan-Ka
    Yang, Chia-Hsuan
    Lin, Yi-Hao
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2025, : 857 - 866
  • [23] Surgical outcomes of anterior trans-obturator mesh and vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation for severe pelvic organ prolapse in overweight and obese Asian women
    Lo, Tsia-Shu
    Tan, Yiap Loong
    Khanuengkitkong, Siwatchaya
    Dass, Anil Krishna
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 24 (05) : 809 - 816
  • [24] Should we add unilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation to vaginal hysterectomy in management of stage 3 and stage 4 pelvic organ prolapse?
    Agacayak, Elif
    Tunc, Senem Yaman
    Icen, Mehmet Sait
    Basaranoglu, Serdar
    Findik, Fatih Mehmet
    Sak, Sibel
    Ceter, Yasemin
    Akin, Gamze
    Gul, Talip
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 12 (03) : 144 - 150
  • [25] Quality of life and sexuality after bilateral sacrospinous fixation with vaginal hysterectomy for treatment of primary pelvic organ prolapse
    Yalcin, Yakup
    Caltekin, Melike Demir
    Yalcin, Serenat Eris
    LUTS-LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS, 2020, 12 (03) : 206 - 210
  • [26] Sacrospinous ligament fixation for vaginal vault prolapse
    Lantzsch T.
    Goepel C.
    Wolters M.
    Koelbl H.
    Methfessel H.D.
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2001, 265 (1) : 21 - 25
  • [27] Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus conventional vaginal surgery for sacrospinous ligament fixation of apical compartment prolapse: a retrospective analysis
    Huang, Lu
    Yu, Jie
    Li, Yan
    Gong, Zhao-Lin
    Feng, Dan
    He, Li
    Lin, Yong-Hong
    BMC SURGERY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [28] Medium-term outcomes of laparoscopic pubocervical fascia reconstruction and sacrospinous ligament fixation with posterior approach for a pelvic organ prolapse: A retrospective study of 124 cases
    Zhu, Yunshan
    Zhang, Xiao
    Chen, Danxia
    Li, Guangxiao
    Shang, Shanliang
    Li, Jianqiong
    Yang, Jianhua
    LAPAROSCOPIC ENDOSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 6 (04): : 154 - 159
  • [29] Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension versus sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: perioperative outcomes
    Gabra, Martina G.
    Winget, Veronica
    Torabi, Mohammad T.
    Addis, Ilana
    Hatch, Kenneth
    Heusinkveld, John
    GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY, 2021, 18 (01)
  • [30] Comparison of Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy and Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation Techniques Applied Concomitantly in Patients Undergoing Vaginal or Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Uterovaginal Pelvic Prolapse
    Unal, Omer
    Karadeniz, Ozan
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 50 (05)