Consumer knowledge affects valuation of product attributes: Experimental results for wine

被引:34
作者
Gustafson, Christopher R. [1 ]
Lybbert, Travis J. [2 ]
Sumner, Daniel A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Dept Agr Econ, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Univ Calif, Agr Issues Ctr, Davis, CA USA
关键词
Consumer knowledge; Willingness to pay; Auctions; Updating; Wine attributes; NUTRITION KNOWLEDGE; CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; EXPERT REVIEWS; WINNERS CURSE; INFORMATION; QUALITY; PRICE; PSYCHOLOGY; ECONOMICS; AUCTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.socec.2016.08.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
While a substantial literature on the effect of professional expertise in markets exists, consumers' "homegrown" knowledge has received little attention in economics. We combine data from a novel valuation experiment, in which participants received information about and bid on wines sequentially, with data on participants' wine knowledge to examine knowledge and bid updating. High knowledge participants did not value wines differently, but did update bids more with objective information, such as appellation and expert rating, than did low knowledge participants. Both low and high knowledge participants updated their bids significantly after taste-testing the wines. Our findings provide evidence that knowledge and preference are separable, and that knowledge captures a factor giving consumers the ability to process information to form expectations of product quality. Though both low and high knowledge consumers use sensory information, we find differences in preference for wines based on sensory information between low and high knowledge consumers. Our results suggest that knowledge is an important variable to consider in markets for complex, multi-attribute products. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 94
页数:10
相关论文
共 65 条
[31]   General Evaluability Theory [J].
Hsee, Christopher K. ;
Zhang, Jiao .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 5 (04) :343-355
[32]   The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives [J].
Hsee, CK .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1996, 67 (03) :247-257
[33]   The knowing nose: the role of knowledge in wine expertise [J].
Hughson, AL ;
Boakes, RA .
FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2002, 13 (7-8) :463-472
[34]  
ITB (Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau), 2015, WIN APP OR
[35]  
Iyengar Sheena., 2004, PENSION DESIGN STRUC
[36]   Choice proliferation, simplicity seeking, and asset allocation [J].
Iyengar, Sheena S. ;
Kamenica, Emir .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2010, 94 (7-8) :530-539
[37]   When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? [J].
Iyengar, SS ;
Lepper, MR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 79 (06) :995-1006
[38]   The effect of information on product quality: Evidence from restaurant hygiene grade cards [J].
Jin, GZ ;
Leslie, P .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2003, 118 (02) :409-451
[39]   Measuring perceptions of quality in food products: the case of red wine [J].
Jover, AJV ;
Montes, FJL ;
Fuentes, MDF .
FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2004, 15 (05) :453-469
[40]   CROSS-GAME LEARNING - EXPERIMENTAL-EVIDENCE FROM FIRST-PRICE AND ENGLISH COMMON VALUE AUCTIONS [J].
KAGEL, JH .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1995, 49 (02) :163-170