Sensitivity-based uncertainty analysis of a combined travel demand model

被引:2
作者
Yang, Chao [1 ]
Chen, Anthony [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Xiangdong [2 ]
Wong, S. C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Key Lab Rd & Traff Engn, Shanghai 201804, Peoples R China
[2] Utah State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Civil Engn, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
20TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC THEORY (ISTTT 2013) | 2013年 / 80卷
关键词
Uncertainty analysis; sensitivity analysis; nonlinear program; combined travel demand model; COMBINED TRIP DISTRIBUTION; TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT; MODAL SPLIT; PROPAGATION; GENERATION; ALGORITHMS; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.05.022
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Travel demand forecasting is subject to great uncertainties. A systematic uncertainty analysis can provide insights into the level of confidence on the model outputs, and also identify critical sources of uncertainty for enhancing the robustness of the travel demand model. In this paper, we develop a systematic framework for quantitative uncertainty analysis of a combined travel demand model (CTDM) using the analytical sensitivity-based method. The CTDM overcomes limitations of the sequential four-step procedure since it is based on a single unifying rationale. The analytical sensitivity-based method requires less computational effort than the sampling-based method. Meanwhile, the uncertainties stemming from inputs and parameters can be treated separately so that the individual and collective effects of uncertainty on the outputs can be clearly assessed and quantified. Numerical examples are finally used to demonstrate the proposed sensitivity-based uncertainty analysis method for the CTDM. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 415
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Origin-based algorithms for combined travel forecasting models [J].
Bar-Gera, H ;
Boyce, D .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2003, 37 (05) :405-422
[2]  
Bell MGH, 1999, TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC THEORY, P283
[3]   TRANSPORT MODELING - SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS AND POLICY TESTING [J].
BONSALL, PW ;
CHAMPERNOWNE, AF ;
MASON, AC ;
WILSON, AG .
PROGRESS IN PLANNING, 1977, 7 :153-237
[4]  
Bowman J. L., 2002, WORKING PAPER
[5]   Is the sequential travel forecasting paradigm counterproductive? [J].
Boyce, D .
JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 128 (04) :169-183
[6]  
Boyce D, 2001, CONTRIB TO ECON ANAL, V249, P85
[7]  
Boyce D.E., 1994, TRANSPORT RES REC, V1443, P65
[8]  
Boyce DE, 1997, DESIGN AND OPERATION OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, P277
[9]   IMPLEMENTATION AND COMPUTATIONAL ISSUES FOR COMBINED MODELS OF LOCATION, DESTINATION, MODE, AND ROUTE CHOICE [J].
BOYCE, DE ;
CHON, KS ;
LEE, YJ ;
LIN, KT ;
LEBLANC, LJ .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 1983, 15 (09) :1219-1230
[10]   Monte Carlo modeling with uncertain probability density functions [J].
Brattin, WJ ;
Barry, TM ;
Chiu, N .
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 1996, 2 (04) :820-840