Trephine Core Procedure Versus Bone-Added Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation in the Augmentation of the Sinus Floor: A Comparative Clinical and Radiographic Study

被引:6
作者
Chandra, Rampalli Viswa [1 ]
Suvvari, Neeraja [1 ]
Reddy, Aileni Amarender [1 ]
机构
[1] SVS Inst Dent Sci, Dept Periodont, Mahabubnagar 509002, Telangana, India
关键词
dental implant; maxillary sinus; sinus floor augmentation; trephining; RESONANCE FREQUENCY-ANALYSIS; IMPLANTS; STABILITY; PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.5998
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to clinically and radiographically compare the trephine core procedure and the bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation technique in the augmentation of the sinus floor. Materials and Methods: A single site in each subject requiring sinus augmentation where the residual bone height was similar to 4 mm was randomly allocated to either the trephine core procedure or the bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation technique. Measures of bone fill and bone height were also acquired through scans from cone beam computed tomography obtained before the sinus augmentation procedure (baseline) and before implant placement at approximately 6 months postoperatively. Clinical parameters for healing (early wound healing index), swelling (measurement of preset facial landmarks), and pain (through visual analog scale) were assessed at 1 week and 2 weeks after surgery. The evaluation of bone fill was performed using the digital subtraction technique and morphometric area analysis on the baseline and postoperative scans using two kinds of image processing software. Implants were placed after a healing period of 4 to 6 months, and implant stability quotient values (using SmartPeg Type 49) were recorded immediately after implant placement. Results: While both of the procedures resulted in an increase in bone fill and bone height, there were no significant differences between the techniques. No significant differences were observed between the two groups for implant stability quotient values after implant placement. No significant differences were observed between the two groups for measures of healing, swelling, and pain. Conclusion: Based upon this study that compared the trephine core procedure with the bone-added osteotome sinus elevation technique, comparing bone height, bone fill, and primary implant stability, the two procedures appeared to perform in an equivalent fashion.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 432
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Histological and Histomorphometric Human Results of HA-Beta-TCP 30/70 Compared to Three Different Biomaterials in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation at 6 Months: A Preliminary Report
    Annibali, Susanna
    Iezzi, Giovanna
    Sfasciotti, Gian Luca
    Cristalli, Maria Paola
    Vozza, Iole
    Mangano, Carlo
    La Monaca, Gerardo
    Polimeni, Antonella
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2014, J INDIAN ACAD ORAL M
  • [3] Barewal RM, 2003, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V18, P641
  • [4] Endoscopic evaluation of the bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation procedure
    Berengo, M
    Sivolella, S
    Majzoub, Z
    Cordioli, G
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 33 (02) : 189 - 194
  • [5] BOYNE PJ, 1980, J ORAL SURG, V38, P613
  • [6] Cosci F, 2000, Implant Dent, V9, P363, DOI 10.1097/00008505-200009040-00014
  • [7] Evaluation of factors influencing resonance frequency analysis values, at insertion surgery, of implants placed in sinus-augmented and nongrafted sites
    Degidi, Marco
    Daprile, Giuseppe
    Piattelli, Adriano
    Carinci, Francesco
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2007, 9 (03) : 144 - 149
  • [8] Deporter D, 2000, INT J PERIODONT REST, V20, P477
  • [9] Emtiaz Shahram, 2006, Implant Dent, V15, P171, DOI 10.1097/01.id.0000220550.27164.74
  • [10] Microsurgical access flap in conjunction with enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of intra-bony defects: a controlled clinical trial
    Fickl, Stefan
    Thalmair, Tobias
    Kebschull, Moritz
    Boehm, Sonja
    Wachtel, Hannes
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2009, 36 (09) : 784 - 790