Interval Recourse Linear Programming for Resources and Environmental Systems Management under Uncertainty

被引:22
作者
Cheng, G. H. [1 ]
Huang, G. H. [2 ]
Dong, C. [1 ]
Baetz, B. W. [3 ]
Li, Y. P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regina, UR BNU, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, Ctr Energy Environm & Ecol Res, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, UR BNU, Ctr Energy Environm & Ecol Res, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[3] McMaster Univ, Fac Engn, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
[4] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Lab Water Environm Simulat, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
关键词
resources and environmental management; interval linear programming; constraint violation; OPTIMIZATION MODELING APPROACH; ROBUST OPTIMIZATION; WATER-RESOURCES; MULTIPLE UNCERTAINTIES; OBJECTIVE FUNCTION; CONSTRAINT-VIOLATION; POLLUTION MITIGATION; POWER SYSTEM; RIVER-BASIN; LAND-USE;
D O I
10.3808/jei.201500312
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Interval recourse linear programming (IRLP) is proposed for mitigating constraint violation problems in resources and environmental systems management (REM) under interval uncertainties. Based on a review of interval linear programming (ILP) and its significances to REM, two linear programming sub-models are employed to initialize a decision space in IRLP. The causes of constraint violation are examined based on identification of a violation criterion. Contraction ratios are defined after revelation of violation ranges of constraints. As a recourse measure to resolve constraint violation problems, another two linear programming sub-models are constructed given a series of contraction ratios. A hypercube decision space where infeasible solutions are excluded is obtained. A postoptimality analysis is conducted to deal with the barriers for applying the IRLP approach to address real-world REM problems under interval uncertainties. A selected REM problem is introduced to demonstrate the procedures and effectiveness of the IRLP approach. Comparisons with existing ILP methods reveal that the IRLP approach is effective at avoiding constraint violation, reproducing the largest decision space which does not include infeasible solutions, and enhancing the reliability of decision support for REM.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 136
页数:18
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Linear programming 2: theory and extensions
[2]   Robust optimization - methodology and applications [J].
Ben-Tal, A ;
Nemirovski, A .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 2002, 92 (03) :453-480
[3]  
Ben-Tal A, 2009, PRINC SER APPL MATH, P3
[4]   The price of robustness [J].
Bertsimas, D ;
Sim, M .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2004, 52 (01) :35-53
[5]   Theory and Applications of Robust Optimization [J].
Bertsimas, Dimitris ;
Brown, David B. ;
Caramanis, Constantine .
SIAM REVIEW, 2011, 53 (03) :464-501
[6]   Robust optimization - A comprehensive survey [J].
Beyer, Hans-Georg ;
Sendhoff, Bernhard .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2007, 196 (33-34) :3190-3218
[7]   Identification of optimal strategies for energy management systems planning under multiple uncertainties [J].
Cai, Y. P. ;
Huang, G. H. ;
Yang, Z. F. ;
Tan, Q. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2009, 86 (04) :480-495
[8]   Multiobjective programming in optimization of interval objective functions - A generalized approach [J].
Chanas, S ;
Kuchta, D .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 94 (03) :594-598
[9]   Water pollution control in river basin by interactive fuzzy interval multiobjective programming [J].
Chang, NB ;
Chen, HW ;
Shaw, DG ;
Yang, CH .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1997, 123 (12) :1208-1216
[10]   A fuzzy interval multiobjective mixed integer programming approach for the optimal planning of solid waste management systems [J].
Chang, NB ;
Chen, YL ;
Wang, SF .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1997, 89 (01) :35-60