Long-term outcomes after totally robotic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

被引：32

作者：

Germain, A. ^{[1
]}

Thibault, F. ^{[2
]}

Galifet, M. ^{[1
]}

Scherrer, M. -L. ^{[1
]}

Ayav, A. ^{[1
]}

Hubert, J. ^{[2
]}

Brunaud, L. ^{[1
]}

Bresler, L. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Hosp Nancy Brabois, Dept Digest Surg, F-54511 Nancy, France

[2] Univ Hosp Nancy Brabois, Dept Urol, F-54511 Nancy, France

来源：

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2013年 / 27卷 / 02期

关键词：

Robotic surgery; Da Vinci; Pelvic organ prolapse; Sacrocolpopexy; ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC SACROCOLPOPEXY; VAGINAL VAULT PROLAPSE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ABDOMINAL SACROCOLPOPEXY; SURGERY; INCONTINENCE; POSTERIOR; ANTERIOR; REPAIR; MESHES;

D O I：

10.1007/s00464-012-2472-4

中图分类号：

R61 [外科手术学];

学科分类号：

摘要：

This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, effectiveness, and long-term results of pelvic organ prolapse surgery using the Da Vinci(A (R)) robotic system. During a 7-year period, 52 consecutive patients with pelvic organ prolapse underwent robotic-assisted abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Clinical data were retrospectively collected and analyzed. All but two of the procedures were successfully completed robotically (96 %). Median operative time was 190 (range, 75-340) mins. There was no mortality and no specific morbidity due to the robotic approach. Mean hospital stay was 5 days. The median follow-up was 42 months. Five recurrent prolapses (9.6 %) were diagnosed. Our experience indicates that using the Da-Vinci(A (R)) robotic system is feasible, safe, and effective for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse with good long-term results.

引用

页码：525 / 529

页数：5

共 19 条

[1] Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve [J].

Akl, Mohamed N. ;

Long, Jaime B. ;

Giles, Dobie L. ;

Cornella, Jeffrey L. ;

Pettit, Paul D. ;

Chen, Anita H. ;

Magtibay, Paul M. .

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (10) :2390-2394

[2] Laparoscopic promontory sacral colpopexy: Is the posterior, recto-vaginal, mesh mandatory? [J].

Antiphon, P ;

Elard, S ;

Benyoussef, A ;

Fofana, M ;

Yiou, R ;

Gettman, M ;

Hoznek, A ;

Vordos, D ;

Chopin, DK ;

Abbou, CC .

EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2004, 45 (05) :655-661

[3] Robotic-assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery [J].

Ayav, A ;

Bresler, L ;

Hubert, J ;

Brunaud, L ;

Boissel, P .

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (09) :1200-1203

[4] The effect of pelvic organ prolapse on lower urinary tract function [J].

Bai, SW ;

Kang, SH ;

Kim, SK ;

Kim, JY ;

Park, KH .

YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 44 (01) :94-98

[5] Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: A prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation [J].

Benson, JT ;

Lucente, V ;

McClellan, E .

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (06) :1418-1421

[6] Surgical strategies for women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary stress incontinence [J].

Borstad, Ellen ;

Abdelnoor, Michael ;

Staff, Anne Cathrine ;

Kulseng-Hanssen, Sigurd .

INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2010, 21 (02) :179-186

[7] Does robotic adrenalectomy improve patient quality of life when compared to laparoscopic adrenalectomy? [J].

Brunaud, L ;

Bresler, L ;

Zarnegar, R ;

Ayav, A ;

Cormier, L ;

Tretou, S ;

Boissel, P .

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 28 (11) :1180-1185

[8]

Cosson M, 2000, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), V29, P746

[9] Robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy/sacrouteropexy repair of advanced female pelvic organ prolaspe (POP): utilizing POP-quantification-based staging and outcomes [J].

Daneshgari, Firouz ;

Kefer, John C. ;

Moore, Courtenay ;

Kaouk, Jihad .

BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 100 (04) :875-879

[10] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse [J].

DiMarco, DS ;

Chow, GK ;

Gettman, MT ;

Elliott, DS .

UROLOGY, 2004, 63 (02) :373-376

← 1 2 →