Factors that may affect outcome in cervical artificial disc replacement: a systematic review

被引:14
作者
Kang, Jian [1 ,2 ]
Shi, Changgui [1 ]
Gu, Yifei [1 ]
Yang, Chengwei [1 ,3 ]
Gao, Rui [1 ]
机构
[1] Second Mil Med Univ, Changzheng Hosp, Dept Spine Surg, Shanghai 200003, Peoples R China
[2] Jinan Gen Hosp PLA, Dept Orthoped, Jinan 250031, Peoples R China
[3] Lanzhou Gen Hosp PLA, Dept Spine Surg, Lanzhou 730050, Peoples R China
关键词
Artificial disc replacement; Systematic review; Factors; Outcome; Pooled results; INVESTIGATIONAL DEVICE EXEMPTION; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; ANTERIOR DISKECTOMY; FOLLOW-UP; CONTROLLED MULTICENTER; ARTHROPLASTY; FUSION; DECOMPRESSION; ADJACENT; MOTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-015-4096-6
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
To identify the factors that may affect outcome in C-ADR and provide the pooled results of postoperative success rate of implanted segment range of motion (ROM), incidence of heterotopic ossification (HO), incidence of radiographic adjacent segment degeneration (r-ASD)/adjacent segment disease (ASD), and surgery rate for ASD. We systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library and Web of knowledge from 2001 to May 2015. Two independent reviewers screened the primary records. Eleven questions regarding the effect of patient selection issues and radiographic parameters issues on outcome were posed previously. Studies addressing the framed questions were included for analysis. Twenty-two studies were included for the final analysis. Results showed that number of surgical level (single versus double-level) had no effect on primary clinical outcome and radiographic outcome, surgical level had no effect on clinical and radiographic outcome, and smoking habits had negative effect on clinical outcome. No evidence for the effect of patient's age and pathology category (radiculopathy or myelopathy) on outcome was found. The overall success rate of ROM was 79.4 %. ROM of the implanted segment and cervical sagittal alignment had no effects on clinical outcome. The pooled incidences of grade 1-4 HO and grade 3-4 HO were 27.7 and 7.8 %, respectively. The pooled incidence of r-ASD and surgery rate for ASD were 42.4 and 3.8 %, respectively. The available evidence showed that most of the pre-selected factors had no effect on outcome after C-ADR, and the ROM success rate, incidence of HO and r-ASD/ASD, and surgery rate for ASD are acceptable. There is a lack of evidence from RCTs for some factors.
引用
收藏
页码:2023 / 2032
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Cervical disc arthroplasty: General introduction [J].
Acosta, FL ;
Ames, CP .
NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2005, 16 (04) :603-+
[2]  
Bae HW, 2015, SPINE
[3]   Reoperations in Cervical Total Disc Replacement Compared With Anterior Cervical Fusion Results Compiled From Multiple Prospective Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Trials Conducted at a Single Site [J].
Blumenthal, Scott L. ;
Ohnmeiss, Donna D. ;
Guyer, Richard D. ;
Zigler, Jack E. .
SPINE, 2013, 38 (14) :1177-1182
[4]   Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial [J].
Burkus, J. Kenneth ;
Traynelis, Vincent C. ;
Haid, Regis W., Jr. ;
Mummaneni, Praveen V. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2014, 21 (04) :516-528
[5]   Artificial Cervical Disc Arthroplasty A Systematic Review [J].
Cepoiu-Martin, Monica ;
Faris, Peter ;
Lorenzetti, Diane ;
Prefontaine, Eliza ;
Noseworthy, Tom ;
Sutherland, Lloyd .
SPINE, 2011, 36 (25) :E1623-E1633
[6]   Prevalence of heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc arthroplasty: a meta-analysis [J].
Chen, Jian ;
Wang, Xinwei ;
Bai, Wanshan ;
Shen, Xiaolong ;
Yuan, Wen .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 21 (04) :674-680
[7]   Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site Presented at the 2012 Joint Spine Section Meeting Clinical article [J].
Coric, Domagoj ;
Kim, Paul K. ;
Clemente, Jonathan D. ;
Boltes, Margaret O. ;
Nussbaum, Marcy ;
James, Sara .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2013, 18 (01) :36-42
[8]   Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the KineflexIC artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up Clinical article [J].
Coric, Domagoj ;
Nunley, Pierce D. ;
Guyer, Richard D. ;
Musante, David ;
Carmody, Cameron N. ;
Gordon, Charles R. ;
Lauryssen, Carl ;
Ohnmeiss, Donna D. ;
Boltes, Margaret O. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2011, 15 (04) :348-358
[9]   Five-Year Reoperation Rates, Cervical Total Disc Replacement Versus Fusion, Results of a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Delamarter, Rick B. ;
Zigler, Jack .
SPINE, 2013, 38 (09) :711-717
[10]   A Meta-Analysis Comparing the Results of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) for the Treatment of Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease [J].
Gao, Yu ;
Liu, Ming ;
Li, Tao ;
Huang, Fuguo ;
Tang, Tingting ;
Xiang, Zhou .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2013, 95A (06) :555-561