The Competition-Performance Relation: A Meta-Analytic Review and Test of the Opposing Processes Model of Competition and Performance

被引:217
作者
Murayama, Kou [1 ]
Elliot, Andrew J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Psychol, D-80802 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Rochester, Dept Psychol, Rochester, NY 14627 USA
关键词
rivalry; attainment; productivity; goal structure; reward structure; ACHIEVEMENT GOAL ORIENTATIONS; CRITERION-RELATED VALIDITY; SCHOOL PHYSICAL-EDUCATION; SELF-REGULATORY PROCESSES; STUDENTS ACHIEVEMENT; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; ACADEMIC-ACHIEVEMENT; COGNITIVE ENGAGEMENT; PERCEIVED COMPETENCE;
D O I
10.1037/a0028324
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
What is the relation between competition and performance? The present research addresses this important multidisciplinary question by conducting a meta-analysis of existing empirical work and by proposing a new conceptual model-the opposing processes model of competition and performance. This model was tested by conducting an additional meta-analysis and 3 new empirical studies. The first meta-analysis revealed that there is no noteworthy relation between competition and performance. The second meta-analysis showed, in accord with the opposing processes model, that the absence of a direct effect is the result of inconsistent mediation via achievement goals: Competition prompts performance-approach goals which, in turn, facilitate performance; and competition also prompts performance-avoidance goals which, in turn, undermine performance. These same direct and mediational findings were also observed in the 3 new empirical studies (using 3 different conceptualizations of competition and attending to numerous control variables). Our findings provide both interpretational clarity regarding past research and conceptual guidance regarding future research on the competition-performance relation.
引用
收藏
页码:1035 / 1070
页数:36
相关论文
共 541 条
[81]   Implicit theories of ability of Grade 6 science students: Relation to epistemological beliefs and academic motivation and achievement in science [J].
Chen, Jason A. ;
Pajares, Frank .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 35 (01) :75-87
[82]   Fear of failure, 2 x 2 achievement goal and self-handicapping: An examination of the hierarchical model of achievement motivation in physical education [J].
Chen, Lung Hung ;
Wu, Chia-Huei ;
Kee, Ying Hwa ;
Lin, Meng-Shyan ;
Shui, Shang-Hsueh .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 34 (04) :298-305
[83]  
Chertkoff JM., 1997, ADV GROUP PROCESS, V14, P1
[84]   A model for integrating fixed-, random-, and mixed-effects meta-analyses into structural equation modeling [J].
Cheung, Mike W. -L. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2008, 13 (03) :182-202
[85]   Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: A two-stage approach [J].
Cheung, MWL ;
Chan, W .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2005, 10 (01) :40-64
[86]  
CHEUNG MWL, STRUCTURAL IN PRESS
[87]   Perceived competence and autonomy as moderators of the effects of achievement goal orientations [J].
Cho, YoonJung ;
Weinstein, Claire Ellen ;
Wicker, Frank .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 31 (04) :393-411
[88]   Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes [J].
Church, MA ;
Elliot, AJ ;
Gable, SL .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 93 (01) :43-54
[89]   Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: key factors associated with the test mode effect [J].
Clariana, R ;
Wallace, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 33 (05) :593-602
[90]   The relationship between motivation, learning strategies and choice of environment whether traditional or including an online component [J].
Clayton, Karen ;
Blumberg, Fran ;
Auld, Daniel P. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 41 (03) :349-364