Early Prediction of Cardiogenic Shock Using Machine Learning

被引:16
作者
Chang, Yale [1 ]
Antonescu, Corneliu [2 ,3 ]
Ravindranath, Shreyas [1 ]
Dong, Junzi [1 ]
Lu, Mingyu [4 ]
Vicario, Francesco [1 ]
Wondrely, Lisa [1 ]
Thompson, Pam [2 ]
Swearingen, Dennis [2 ,3 ]
Acharya, Deepak [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Philips Res North Amer, Cambridge, MA 02141 USA
[2] Banner Hlth, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Tucson, AZ USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Phoenix, AZ USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Comp Sci, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
cardiogenic shock; machine learning; electronic health records; early warning system; clinical decision support; subpopulation analysis; SHORT-TERM MORTALITY; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; CLINICAL-PICTURE; RISK PREDICTION; THERAPY;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2022.862424
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a severe condition with in-hospital mortality of up to 50%. Patients who develop CS may have previous cardiac history, but that may not always be the case, adding to the challenges in optimally identifying and managing these patients. Patients may present to a medical facility with CS or develop CS while in the emergency department (ED), in a general inpatient ward (WARD) or in the critical care unit (CC). While different clinical pathways for management exist once CS is recognized, there are challenges in identifying the patients in a timely manner, in all settings, in a timeframe that will allow proper management. We therefore developed and evaluated retrospectively a machine learning model based on the XGBoost (XGB) algorithm which runs automatically on patient data from the electronic health record (EHR). The algorithm was trained on 8 years of de-identified data (from 2010 to 2017) collected from a large regional healthcare system. The input variables include demographics, vital signs, laboratory values, some orders, and specific pre-existing diagnoses. The model was designed to make predictions 2 h prior to the need of first CS intervention (inotrope, vasopressor, or mechanical circulatory support). The algorithm achieves an overall area under curve (AUC) of 0.87 (0.81 in CC, 0.84 in ED, 0.97 in WARD), which is considered useful for clinical use. The algorithm can be refined based on specific elements defining patient subpopulations, for example presence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or congestive heart failure (CHF), further increasing its precision when a patient has these conditions. The top-contributing risk factors learned by the model are consistent with existing clinical findings. Our conclusion is that a useful machine learning model can be used to predict the development of CS. This manuscript describes the main steps of the development process and our results.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Predictors of Outcomes in Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock [J].
Acharya, Deepak .
CARDIOLOGY IN REVIEW, 2018, 26 (05) :255-266
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ICML 06
[3]   Predicting the development of in-hospital cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the ORBI risk score [J].
Auffret, Vincent ;
Cottin, Yves ;
Leurent, Guillaume ;
Gilard, Martine ;
Beer, Jean-Claude ;
Zabalawi, Amer ;
Chague, Frederic ;
Filippi, Emanuelle ;
Brunet, Damien ;
Hacot, Jean-Philippe ;
Brunel, Philippe ;
Mejri, Mourad ;
Lorgis, Luc ;
Rouault, Gilles ;
Druelles, Philippes ;
Cornily, Jean-Christophe ;
Didier, Romain ;
Bot, Emilie ;
Boulanger, Bertrand ;
Coudert, Isabelle ;
Loirat, Aurelie ;
Bedossa, Marc ;
Boulmier, Dominique ;
Maza, Maud ;
Le Guellec, Marielle ;
Puri, Rishi ;
Zeller, Marianne ;
Le Breton, Herve .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 39 (22) :2090-+
[4]  
Bai SJ, 2018, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:1803.01271, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1803.01271]
[5]   Development of a machine learning model to predict the risk of late cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [J].
Bai, Zhixun ;
Hu, Shan ;
Wang, Yan ;
Deng, Wenwen ;
Gu, Ning ;
Zhao, Ranzun ;
Zhang, Wei ;
Ma, Yi ;
Wang, Zhenglong ;
Liu, Zhijiang ;
Shen, Changyin ;
Shi, Bei .
ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (14)
[6]   SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock This document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in April 2019 [J].
Baran, David A. ;
Grines, Cindy L. ;
Bailey, Steven ;
Burkhoff, Daniel ;
Hall, Shelley A. ;
Henry, Timothy D. ;
Hollenberg, Steven M. ;
Kapur, Navin K. ;
O'Neill, William ;
Ornato, Joseph P. ;
Stelling, Kelly ;
Thiele, Holger ;
van Diepen, Sean ;
Naidu, Srihari S. .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 94 (01) :29-37
[7]   Body temperature alterations in the critically ill [J].
Bota, DP ;
Ferreira, FL ;
Mélot, C ;
Vincent, JL .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2004, 30 (05) :811-816
[8]   XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System [J].
Chen, Tianqi ;
Guestrin, Carlos .
KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, :785-794
[9]   High-Sensitivity Troponin T Predicts Postoperative Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients With Valve Disease [J].
Duchnowski, Piotr ;
Hryniewiecki, Tomasz ;
Kusmierczyk, Mariusz ;
Szymanski, Piotr .
SHOCK, 2020, 53 (02) :175-178
[10]   Early revascularization is associated with improved survival in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry [J].
Dzavik, V ;
Steeper, LA ;
Cocke, TP ;
Moscucci, M ;
Saucedo, J ;
Hosat, S ;
Jiang, X ;
Slater, J ;
LeJemtel, T ;
Hochman, JS .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 24 (09) :828-837