Feasibility and safety of hospital discharge 24 hours after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Javier Diaz, Francisco [1 ]
Hernandez, Virginia [1 ]
de la Pena, Enrique [1 ]
Blazquez, Cristina [1 ]
Dolores Martin, Maria [2 ]
Llorente, Carlos [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Fdn Alcorcon, Serv Urol, Madrid 28922, Spain
[2] Hosp Univ Fdn Alcorcon, Madrid 28922, Spain
来源
ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA | 2013年 / 66卷 / 10期
关键词
Prostatic neoplasms; Laparoscopy; Prostatectomy; Hospital stay; Complications; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; EXPERIENCE; COMPLICATIONS; EVOLUTION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive techniques for the surgical treatment of prostate cancer have aimed to achieve the same functional and oncological outcomes of open surgery with a significant decrease in postoperative morbidity and a subsequent decreasing hospital stay These improvements are important in the current economic context. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of hospital discharge 24 h after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). METHODS : A total of 266 consecutive patients with clinical diagnosis of localized prostate cancer consecutively treated with extraperitoneal LRP between May 2007 and December 2010 were analyzed. There were no exclusion criteria for the surgical procedure. Patients were discharged in less than 24 h only in the case of absence of medical complications, with drainage of less than 50 mL allowing its removal before discharge, normal oral feeding tolerance, no significant hematuria by bladder catheter and good functional recovery of the patient. All surgery-related complications that occurred within 90 days after surgery were recorded and were classified according to the modified Clavien scale. RESULTS : A total of 266 patients who underwent LRP were studied with a median follow-up of 34 months. 80 (30.1%) patients were discharged from the hospital in less than 24h. 89 (33.4%) patients were discharged within 48 h and 97 (36.5 %) after 48h. The mean hospital stay of the entire case series was 2.9 days (SD 3.08). The mean hospital stay of patients who were discharged after 48h was 5,5 days (SD 3.94). Thirty-one patients (10.7%) experienced post-surgical complications. 25 (9.3%) of them were classified as Clavien I or II, and 6 (2.2%) Clavien III or IV. A total of 9 (3.3%) patients were readmitted. Of the group of patients who were discharged within 24h only one was readmitted due to hematuria. CONCLUSIONS: Extraperitoneal LRP is the standard treatment for localized prostate cancer in our institution. This treatment reliably and safely allows a hospital stay shorter than 24 h in a significant percentage of our patients.
引用
收藏
页码:931 / 938
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Same Day Discharge After Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
    Najdawi, Faris
    Alcantar, Jonathan
    Lee, David I.
    Shahait, Mohammed
    Dobbs, Ryan W.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2025, 26 (01)
  • [12] Robotic Radical Prostatectomy at a Teaching Community Hospital: Outcomes and Safety
    Padavano, Julianna
    Shaffer, Lynn
    Fannin, Elizabeth
    Burgers, John
    Poll, Wayne
    Ward, Eric S.
    Banks, Kevin
    Bell, Jeffrey G.
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2011, 15 (02) : 193 - 199
  • [13] How Can Lymphocele Development Be Prevented After Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy?
    Yasumizu, Yota
    Miyajima, Akira
    Maeda, Takahiro
    Takeda, Toshikazu
    Hasegawa, Masanori
    Kosaka, Takeo
    Kikuchi, Eiji
    Oya, Mototsugu
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2013, 27 (04) : 447 - 451
  • [14] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial cases at Okayama University Hospital
    Nagai, A
    Nasu, Y
    Shirasaki, Y
    Iguchi, H
    Arata, R
    Tsugawa, M
    Tsushima, T
    Kumon, H
    ACTA MEDICA OKAYAMA, 2002, 56 (01) : 51 - 52
  • [15] Initial results of salvage laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after radiation failure
    Vallancien, G
    Gupta, R
    Cathelineau, X
    Baumert, H
    Rozet, F
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (05) : 1838 - 1840
  • [16] The impact of hospital volume, residency, and fellowship training on perioperative outcomes after radical prostatectomy
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    Sun, Maxine
    Kim, Simon P.
    Sammon, Jesse
    Kowalczyk, Keith J.
    Friedman, Ariella A.
    Sukumar, Shyam
    Ravi, Praful
    Muhletaler, Fred
    Agarwal, Piyush K.
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Hu, Jim C.
    Menon, Mani
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2014, 32 (01) : 29.e13 - 29.e20
  • [17] Health related quality of life before and after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Link, RE
    Su, LM
    Sullivan, W
    Bhayani, SB
    Pavlovich, CP
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (01) : 175 - 179
  • [18] Feasibility of same-day discharge of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection
    Liem, Spencer S.
    Jivanji, Dhaval
    Brown, Shimron
    Demus, Timothy
    Chang, Shuwei Peter
    Lopez, Olga
    Bhandari, Akshay
    Pereira, Jorge F.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
  • [19] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 550 procedures
    Guillonneau, B
    Cathelineau, X
    Doublet, JD
    Baumert, H
    Vallancien, G
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2002, 43 (02) : 123 - 133
  • [20] Early removal of the catheter after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Nadu, A
    Salomon, L
    Hoznek, A
    Olsson, LE
    Saint, F
    de la Taille, A
    Cicco, A
    Chopin, D
    Abbou, CC
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (05) : 1662 - 1664