Feasibility and safety of hospital discharge 24 hours after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Javier Diaz, Francisco [1 ]
Hernandez, Virginia [1 ]
de la Pena, Enrique [1 ]
Blazquez, Cristina [1 ]
Dolores Martin, Maria [2 ]
Llorente, Carlos [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Fdn Alcorcon, Serv Urol, Madrid 28922, Spain
[2] Hosp Univ Fdn Alcorcon, Madrid 28922, Spain
来源
ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA | 2013年 / 66卷 / 10期
关键词
Prostatic neoplasms; Laparoscopy; Prostatectomy; Hospital stay; Complications; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; EXPERIENCE; COMPLICATIONS; EVOLUTION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive techniques for the surgical treatment of prostate cancer have aimed to achieve the same functional and oncological outcomes of open surgery with a significant decrease in postoperative morbidity and a subsequent decreasing hospital stay These improvements are important in the current economic context. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of hospital discharge 24 h after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). METHODS : A total of 266 consecutive patients with clinical diagnosis of localized prostate cancer consecutively treated with extraperitoneal LRP between May 2007 and December 2010 were analyzed. There were no exclusion criteria for the surgical procedure. Patients were discharged in less than 24 h only in the case of absence of medical complications, with drainage of less than 50 mL allowing its removal before discharge, normal oral feeding tolerance, no significant hematuria by bladder catheter and good functional recovery of the patient. All surgery-related complications that occurred within 90 days after surgery were recorded and were classified according to the modified Clavien scale. RESULTS : A total of 266 patients who underwent LRP were studied with a median follow-up of 34 months. 80 (30.1%) patients were discharged from the hospital in less than 24h. 89 (33.4%) patients were discharged within 48 h and 97 (36.5 %) after 48h. The mean hospital stay of the entire case series was 2.9 days (SD 3.08). The mean hospital stay of patients who were discharged after 48h was 5,5 days (SD 3.94). Thirty-one patients (10.7%) experienced post-surgical complications. 25 (9.3%) of them were classified as Clavien I or II, and 6 (2.2%) Clavien III or IV. A total of 9 (3.3%) patients were readmitted. Of the group of patients who were discharged within 24h only one was readmitted due to hematuria. CONCLUSIONS: Extraperitoneal LRP is the standard treatment for localized prostate cancer in our institution. This treatment reliably and safely allows a hospital stay shorter than 24 h in a significant percentage of our patients.
引用
收藏
页码:931 / 938
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimization of an early discharge program after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Diaz, F. J.
    de la Pena, E.
    Hernandez, V.
    Lopez, B.
    de la Morena, J. M.
    Martin, M. D.
    Jimenez-Valladolid, I.
    Llorente, C.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2014, 38 (06): : 355 - 360
  • [2] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after transurethral resection of the prostate
    Rozet, Francois
    Barret, Eric
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    Galiano, Marc
    Vallancien, Guy
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2009, 19 (02): : F36 - F39
  • [3] Patient's safety and satisfaction on same day discharge after robotic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus discharge after 24 or 48 h: a longitudinal randomized prospective study
    Faria, Eliney Ferreira
    Machado, Roberto Dias
    Gualberto, Rodrigo Jose Costa
    Milani, Marina Assuncao Valadares
    Bidinotto, Lucas Tadeu
    Machado, Marcos Tobias
    dos Reis, Ricardo
    Bidinotto, Daniele Natalia Pacharone Bertolini
    BMC UROLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [4] A Prospective Study of Symptom Distress and Return to Baseline Function After Open Versus Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Dahl, Douglas M.
    Barry, Michael J.
    McGovern, Francis J.
    Chang, Yuchaio
    Walker-Corkery, Elizabeth
    McDougal, W. Scott
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (03) : 956 - 965
  • [5] Outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Challacombe, Benjamin J.
    Costello, Anthony J.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2009, 11 (01) : 94 - 99
  • [6] Is Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus a Predictive Factor for Incontinence After Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy? A Matched Pair and Multivariate Analysis
    Teber, Dogu
    Sofikerim, Mustafa
    Ates, Mutlu
    Goezen, Ali Serdar
    Guven, Oguz
    Sanli, Oener
    Rassweiler, Jens
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (03) : 1087 - 1091
  • [7] Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Hruza, Marcel
    Bermejo, Justo Lorenzo
    Flinspach, Bettina
    Schulze, Michael
    Teber, Dogu
    Rumpelt, Hans Joachim
    Rassweiler, Jens Jochen
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (02) : 271 - 280
  • [8] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Early safety and efficacy
    Wilson, LC
    Kennett, KM
    Gilling, PJ
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 74 (12) : 1065 - 1068
  • [9] Patient’s safety and satisfaction on same day discharge after robotic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus discharge after 24 or 48 h: a longitudinal randomized prospective study
    Eliney Ferreira Faria
    Roberto Dias Machado
    Rodrigo José Costa Gualberto
    Marina Assunção Valadares Milani
    Lucas Tadeu Bidinotto
    Marcos Tobias Machado
    Ricardo dos Reis
    Daniele Natália Pacharone Bertolini Bidinotto
    BMC Urology, 23
  • [10] Evaluation of the functional results and safety of early removal of the urethral catheter after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Kotov, S., V
    Guspanov, R., I
    Byadretdinov, I. Sh
    Ryabov, M. A.
    Pulbere, S. A.
    Yusufov, A. G.
    Zhilov, M. S.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2022, 18 (01): : 38 - 47