How to Prioritize the Attributes of Water Ecosystem Service for Water Security Management: Choice Experiments versus Analytic Hierarchy Process

被引:3
作者
Arellanos, Erick [1 ]
Guzman, Wagner [2 ]
Garcia, Ligia [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Toribio Rodriguez de Mendoza Amazonas, Inst Invest Ingn Ambiental, Calle Higos Urco 342, Chachapoyas 01001, Peru
[2] Superintendencia Nacl Serv Saneamiento Peru, Av Bernardo Monteagudo 210-216, Lima 15076, Peru
[3] Univ Nacl Toribio Rodriguez de Mendoza Amazonas, Inst Invest Para Desarrollo Sustentable Ceja Selv, Calle Higos Urco 342, Chachapoyas 01001, Peru
关键词
water ecosystem service; attributes; choice experiments; analytic hierarchy process; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; PREFERENCES; DESIGN;
D O I
10.3390/su142315767
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The various ecosystem services related to water form a complex structure that impacts on human well-being so it is necessary to know the relationships between their attributes to support decision making for water security. Our work investigates individual preferences for water ecosystem service attributes in the Tilacancha River Microbasin, in northern Peru, using two methods of a different nature. In that context, prioritization results using Choice Experiments and Analytic Hierarchy Process are compared for their abilities to represent purchase preferences and theoretical preferences, respectively. Both methods reveal that in a context of abundant water resources, the public has a higher preference for the attributes Quality Maintenance and Water Regulation, over Sediment Control and Water Yield, which were less valued. The differences allowed us to identify possible applications of the results useful for water security management. Additionally, we conclude that it is possible to combine the results of both methods to support decision making, and we highlight the specific cases in which it is appropriate to use the methods individually.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation [J].
Adamowicz, W ;
Boxall, P ;
Williams, M ;
Louviere, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (01) :64-75
[2]  
Adamowicz W., 1998, Introduction to attribute-based stated choice methods
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, [No title captured]
[4]  
Aznar J., 2015, VALORACION ACTIVOS A, V2nd
[5]  
Aznar J., 2012, NUEVOS METODOS VALOR
[6]   The worldwide research trends on water ecosystem services [J].
Aznar-Sanchez, Jose A. ;
Velasco-Munoz, Juan F. ;
Belmonte-Urena, Luis J. ;
Manzano-Agugliaro, Francisco .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 99 :310-323
[7]   Use and usefulness of open source spatial databases for the assessment and management of European coastal and marine ecosystem services [J].
Caro, Claudia ;
Pinto, Rute ;
Marques, Joao Carlos .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 95 :41-52
[8]   A comparison of citizen and "expert" preferences using an attribute-based approach to choice [J].
Colombo, S. ;
Angus, A. ;
Morris, J. ;
Parsons, D. J. ;
Brawn, M. ;
Stacey, K. ;
Hanley, N. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (11) :2834-2841
[9]  
Consorcio para el Desarrollo Sostenible de la Ecorregion Andina (CONDESAN), 2014, INF DHR MICR RIO TIL
[10]  
Consorcio para el Desarrollo Sostenible de la Ecorregion Andina (CONDESAN), 2014, MEC COMP BEN INTR PL